JarHeadJim
I have never won sheet!
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2011
- Messages
- 130,106
- Like
- 407,015
Mulvey was injured too. He only started the last 5 games of Siena’s season which included the NCAA’s. They were snakebit with injuries. He only started after their starting player was prevented by the NCAA to play any more games.From what I understand [and there are lots of closet Siena fans who might have more detail], this guy was their starter at the beginning of the season at center. He only played about 10 games, before being injured -- then they shifted to Mulvey as the starter.
Averaged 9 and 7 as the starting center. Limited data set / number of games, but seems like he has size and can board.
I think it’s a good strategy. Shore up your bench, depth, and wing positions so you know how much you have to spend on the two most important positions on the court.Precursor move to having enough NIL for bidding war additions at the 5 and/or PG. In that context alone, adding players like Goodrick (and Folefac) is a savvy move. Obviously, the most difficult part of that equation is yet to come.
There is something to be said as well for having a few guys who understand what GMAC wants and how he operates his practices. I agree it’s a good strategy.I think it’s a good strategy. Shore up your bench, depth, and wing positions so you know how much you have to spend on the two most important positions on the court.
And why, to my way of thinking anyway, it makes way more sense to evaluate the roster as a whole at the end of the process rather than worrying about how many Siena players we are adding during the process.I think it’s a good strategy. Shore up your bench, depth, and wing positions so you know how much you have to spend on the two most important positions on the court.
Those guys are…. Quite a bit better, I’d imagine. But, they are definitely white!This is the same type of guy that if he played for someone else would kill us yearly.
He’s PJ Hall at Clemson
He’s Luke Harangody at ND
Not saying he’s as good as them but we always get shredded by dudes around the same size and a really good post skill level.
I think a starter a Siena can be a fine bench piece here. At least we know they can play. We’ve had guys off the bench in recent years who can’t walk and chew gum.And why, to my way of thinking anyway, it makes way more sense to evaluate the roster as a whole at the end of the process rather than worrying about how many Siena players we are adding during the process.
To be honest, I didnt really watch any of the early Siena games.For those in the know. What are his strengths and weaknesses?
We seem to be heading in the right direction. If nothing else, the roster construction to date suggests foresight. That's a refreshing change.I think a starter a Siena can be a fine bench piece here. At least we know they can play. We’ve had guys off the bench in recent years who can’t walk and chew gum.
Precursor move to having enough NIL for bidding war additions at the 5 and/or PG. In that context alone, adding players like Goodrick (and Folefac) is a savvy move. Obviously, the most difficult part of that equation is yet to come.