so you think shooting 45% at that volume is bad?
he also scored 44 pts per game on his FR team
looked at a few games
Kent 1968. pete 16-38 42% his team 21-51 41% fts 12-15 his team 10-16..
Maybe he should have shot more.
Look at the top scorers in the NCAA this yr. The top 7 are Guards.
Davis is leading shooting 41% The rest are all around 45% but 1
They all shoot about 10-11 3s a game.
The one kid from Marshall stands out though. shooting 57% and almost no 3s at all
In the 10 yrs before he got there they were 88-135.
The year he first got there they were 3-23 and he played on the FR team
They went 49-35 when he played finished 2nd but had to go to the NIT and go to the SEMIs
The next 2 yrs went 24-28 and then his dad left.
I may have went a little too "hot" in my "hot" take. No doubt he is an all time college great player. I just have a hard time when people call him the greatest college player ever based on his crazy scoring stats.
He made his team better... I am not arguing that. He was a great player. But the team could have probably been even better if he didn't play so selfishly
He was a wizard driving to the basket and in transition, but also took many low efficiency long 2's. May have been acceptable today when a lower % shot is rewarded with 3 points, but not back then. Opposing coaches would happily let him take those shots.
He's a career 44%. That efficiency was not particularly impressive for that era -- not that it was bad either.
As for citing a few games where he shot better than the rest of the team, why don't you look at entire seasons in terms of how he shot compared to the team. That information is readily available and can be easily calculated. The differences are significant
1968 : Pete 42%, Rest of Team 52%
1969: Pete 44%, Rest of Team 52%
1970: Pete 45%, Rest of Team 52%
Of course the rest of the team shooting will benefit from one player taking the majority of the half court shots, such that their shots are weighted to garbage / transition types.
Check out the detailed 1969-70 LSU Fighting Tigers Roster and Stats for College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
www.sports-reference.com
LSU SEC Records:
67: 1-17 (pre-Pete)
68: 8-10
69: 7-11
70: 13-5
71: 10-8 (after Pete)
He made the team better. But if he was the greatest player in college basketball history he should have made his team much better -- and the team should have been much worse after he left.
If you look at the LSU teams they basically replaced that entire 67 team, and only played sophomore in 68. The only reason he ever played on a team over .500 in conference was because LSU brought in a few good sophomores in his last year that helped the team still be pretty good after he left.
The team didn't take a huge fall after he left. It took a fall no doubt, but not a fall worthy of losing the "greatest college player ever".