orangepack
Scout Team
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2011
- Messages
- 357
- Like
- 332
Oof..2 min left
what not a single "we shouldn't laugh" post?
Ha ha. I was just going to post this. They did beat us a bunch of times with Dixon so maybe laughing is not allowedNeed a ruling on whether or not it’s ok to laugh at them.
and plus we played bad against CornellHa ha. I was just going to post this. They did beat us a bunch of times with Dixon so maybe laughing is not allowed
This shows how bad NCAA's new NET ratings is.
Niagara No. 259 beat Pittsburgh No. 22
NCAA wants to use NET to replace RPI ratings now. They should think again.
We could lose tonight and it shouldn't surprise anyone.what not a single "we shouldn't laugh" post?
It will get better, as did the RPI when there were more data points. But just like teams gamed the RPI, teams will learn to game the NET. Someone will reverse-engineer the NET formula (probably Nate Silver) to make that job easier.I am no mathematician but I wonder if it is the case of too small a data size. So maybe halfway or further into the season the NET rankings will make sense. Or maybe Adam Silver of 538 is correct and it sucks, time will tell.
Absolutely part of it.I am no mathematician but I wonder if it is the case of too small a data size. So maybe halfway or further into the season the NET rankings will make sense. Or maybe Adam Silver of 538 is correct and it sucks, time will tell.
If you have to bet, bet onI am no mathematician but I wonder if it is the case of too small a data size. So maybe halfway or further into the season the NET rankings will make sense. Or maybe Adam Silver of 538 is correct and it sucks, time will tell.
maybe more likable than dixon but Capel's not likableMuch harder to hate Pitt now that they're not nearly as competitive. Also, Capel seems much more likeable than Dixon or even Stallings.
We could lose tonight and it shouldn't surprise anyone.
Really? I would be shocked if we lost tonightWe could lose tonight and it shouldn't surprise anyone.
If you have to bet, bet onAdamNate Silver. Dude knows what he's talking about.
Adam Silver also does, but not in the field of statistics, haha.