thats the question wrs seemed to be better this year than last but thats not saying muchIs he good WR coach?
thats the question wrs seemed to be better this year than last but thats not saying muchIs he good WR coach?
I think the biggest change with the WRs between 2014-15 was the QB. Not much development away from Ishmael.thats the question wrs seemed to be better this year than last but thats not saying much
Much better blocking from them than I've seen in years. That's pure coaching IMOI think the biggest change with the WRs between 2014-15 was the QB. Not much development away from Ishmael.
Yup. I wonder if that was a Babers decision or a Sowder decision. Money would have been much better at Cuse so it makes me wonder...I wanted to see Sowder here if for no other reason than the fact that he was a WR at Baylor under Briles and Babers, so he's lived it. That would seem to be a huge asset.
Probably OC there which equals raise and title increaseYup. I wonder if that was a Babers decision or a Sowder decision. Money would have been much better at Cuse so it makes me wonder...
My father,who has been checked out as a football fan for years, sent me a text yesterday saying he is excited for football again. Thanks Coyle!
That is a really tough call. Our QB's were not very good at finding open receivers. If you weren't the primary you probably were not getting the ball. Next year we will see how good Steve really is.I think the biggest change with the WRs between 2014-15 was the QB. Not much development away from Ishmael.
Even as a true freshmen, Dungey did a nice job going through his progressions. Not bad considering that the WR unit was very weak and the scheming was questionable.That is a really tough call. Our QB's were not very good at finding open receivers. If you weren't the primary you probably were not getting the ball. Next year we will see how good Steve really is.
Can't agree with that. I thought he tucked and ran too early because he didn't see open receivers. Mahoney was very bad at reading progressions as well.Even as a true freshmen, Dungey did a nice job going through his progressions. Not bad considering that the WR unit was very weak and the scheming was questionable.
I think ED has a chance to do great in HCDB's system.
Crusty said:Can't agree with that. I thought he tucked and ran too early because he didn't see open receivers. Mahoney was very bad at reading progressions as well. In the ACC, Ish was 18th in receptions, but was 11th in YPR and 4th in TDs. This while playing on the second worst offense in the conference. Lester squandered his talents and both QB's failed to throw it his way enough. Dungey has great upsde but he played like a talented freshman not like a seasoned QB.
Can't agree with that. I thought he tucked and ran too early because he didn't see open receivers. Mahoney was very bad at reading progressions as well.
In the ACC, Ish was 18th in receptions, but was 11th in YPR and 4th in TDs. This while playing on the second worst offense in the conference. Lester squandered his talents and both QB's failed to throw it his way enough. Dungey has great upsde but he played like a talented freshman not like a seasoned QB.
Really? Not even Ryan Nassib?He may have run to quickly at times, but I have never seen an SU QB scan the entire field in the way Dungey did this season.
He really impressed me.
Really? Not even Ryan Nassib?
Really? Not even Ryan Nassib?
Can't agree with that. I thought he tucked and ran too early because he didn't see open receivers. Mahoney was very bad at reading progressions as well.
In the ACC, Ish was 18th in receptions, but was 11th in YPR and 4th in TDs. This while playing on the second worst offense in the conference. Lester squandered his talents and both QB's failed to throw it his way enough. Dungey has great upsde but he played like a talented freshman not like a seasoned QB.
I think you're both right.
Dungey did a good job going through his progressions relative to what we've seen since Nassib. But he didn't do a good enough job - youth, play calling, and system all doing their part to undermine.
As I understand it, the system is both pre and post snap reads. From what I have read, receivers are even given leeway to change up routes depending to how they are being played. If a CB opens up his hips to run with him they can cut the routes off and curl it up. QB and WRs have to be totally in sync.It should probably be said - I think this system relies on more presnap reads than scanning the whole field anyways. And I think for a freshman, ED did that as well as anyone. Guy picks up systems very quickly.
The horror!!! Our true frosh QB who was not not on campus early, and was not the primary recipient of reps in August and battled injury for much of his season, did not play like a seasoned quarterback. He was not the equal of Drew Brees as a senior at Purdue?
Gimme a break. The kid played fantastic considering his baseline of experience. And if you project that in Dino's system, it is easy to be excited. Now, will it all play out exactly that way? Maybe he'll be better, perhaps worse than we anticipate. None of us know. None of us can simply watch the MAC Championship game and know.
Agreed, but that was not my point.He did FAR better than most Frosh QBs. Not like an experienced senior, or a NFL QB, but better than you would expect from a true Frosh.
Agreed. I think he will be even better when he settles down and uses his mobility to extend plays rather than to just take off and run. If he stays healthy, Dino's system might, in time, be a great fit for him.QB's ALWAYS get too much credit and too much of the blame. Dungy was outstanding as a true freshman without the spring no less but has to continue to develop as you said. He seems like a pretty sharp kid so I'd bet he will if he can remain healthy.
Crusty said:Agreed. I think he will be even better when he settles down and uses his mobility to extend plays rather than to just take off and run. If he stays healthy, Dino's system might, in time, be a great fit for him.