At first I was glad; but, it's better to be on the other end of the spectrum.
Not in WVU's case. Sad to see so few mountaineer... graduates.At first I was glad; but, it's better to be on the other end of the spectrum.
I think that means, WVU carries all of the state. Which waters down its grad fan percentage. You kinda want a low percentage; which means, you have a lot of non alum casual fans somewhere. Actually, just attended, not even graduated. Unless, you're using sarcasm font, then nevermind.Not in WVU's case. Sad to see so few mountaineer... graduates.
Yep; sad to see so many fans in the state with absolutely no prospect of graduating from there.I think that means, WVU carries all of the state. Which waters down its grad fan percentage.
The fact that Cruz is now even working at Guard with Bleich ill pretty much solidifies him as the sixth man at the very least. He has been called our most athletic O-Lineman in years by people in the know. If he is not the starting RT by October 1, it will only be because Dakota is excelling there, we have stayed healthy and Ellis is playing at a high level.I think he forgot Cruz will most likely be 6th guy once Bergeron returns.
Everything I have heard is Barron and Hanna are splitting reps at Rover. Hanna will probably play in passing situations.
The numbers are completely made up. It's just a jab at Notre Dame.At first I was glad; but, it's better to be on the other end of the spectrum.
Yeah, was guessing a huge variance. Plus, it's Big Game Boomer again.The numbers are completely made up. It's just a jab at Notre Dame.
So do I read that to say 65% of Syracuse fans actually attended SU? And virtually every Stanford fan went to school there? I don't think so.
Think it means, no one except people that went to Stanford, care about Stanford football. 65% of total SU fans, attended SU. FWIW.So do I read that to say 65% of Syracuse fans actually attended SU? And virtually every Stanford fan went to school there? I don't think so.
Just hilarious that Notre Dame, Duke and Miami are the bottom three. Proof again that their fan bases are just front-runners.
How can you conclude this from the data shown? It could just mean something simple like Marshall, Fairmont St, and Bluefield St graduates mostly root for WVU.Yep; sad to see so many fans in the state with absolutely no prospect of graduating from there.
Are those real numbers or just made up ?Just hilarious that Notre Dame, Duke and Miami are the bottom three. Proof again that their fan bases are just front-runners.
I used a big data, machine-learning technique in R to examine what variables had the greatest predictive power for the graduation outcomes of WV residents identifying as WVU fans entering college from 2010-2019. It turns out that no variables were predictive, but there were trends towards significance for the regularity of dental visits, cans of skoal purchased per week, and the number of siblings or first cousins in a student's immediate ancestry.How can you conclude this from the data shown? It could just mean something simple like Marshall, Fairmont St, and Bluefield St graduates mostly root for WVU.
No wonder your mother finds you such a disappointment.I used a big data, machine-learning technique in R to examine what variables had the greatest predictive power for the graduation outcomes of WV residents identifying as WVU fans entering college from 2010-2019. It turns out that no variables were predictive, but there were trends towards significance for the regularity of dental visits, cans of skoal purchased per week, and the number of siblings or first cousins in a student's immediate ancestry.
That's not why. It's because I'm a WVU graduate.No wonder your mother finds you such a disappointment.
A young man brings a girl home to meet his family. He tells his father “Daddy, she’s a virgin”.No wonder your mother finds you such a disappointment.
Can’t really blame her.That's not why. It's because I'm a WVU graduate.
It’s a jokeJust hilarious that Notre Dame, Duke and Miami are the bottom three. Proof again that their fan bases are just front-runners.
Position | Projected First Team | Projected Second Team |
---|---|---|
QB | Shrader | Wilson |
RB | Tucker | Price or Allen |
OWR | Jackson | Alford or Jones* |
OWR | Gadsden | Brown or Queeley |
IWR | Cooper | Adams or Hayes |
TE | Elmore | Mang |
LT | Bergeron | Manguson |
LG | Ellis | Bradford |
C | Veterello | Ilaoa |
RG | Bleich | Tisdale |
RT | Davis | Cruz |
PK | Smyzt | Denaburg |
DE | Okechukwu | Linton* or Simmons |
DT | Lockett | Darton |
DE | Jaquez | Geer |
WILL | Wax | Sparrow |
SAM | Thompson | Roon |
MIKE | Jones | McDonald |
CB | Williams | Wilson |
CB | Chestnut | Johnson |
ROVER | Barron | Oliver or Hanna |
BS | Carter | Coley |
FS | Simmons* | Clark |
P | Williams | Von Marburg |
LS | Bolinsky | Kelly |
Marshall better than WVU?The Boomer will pay for this
Only question from your rendering above would be chukwu at DE. Wouldn't he slide down to DT this season? He did on passing downs last year. I think Lockett and chukwu rotate. I think Linton gets the nod at DE. Otherwise it looks pretty good.Just my WAG at this as of right now….
Position Projected First Team Projected Second Team QB Shrader Wilson RB Tucker Price or Allen OWR Jackson Alford or Jones* OWR Gadsden Brown or Queeley IWR Cooper Adams or Hayes TE Elmore Mang LT Bergeron Manguson LG Ellis Bradford C Veterello Ilaoa RG Bleich Tisdale RT Davis Cruz PK Smyzt Denaburg DE Okechukwu Linton* or Simmons DT Lockett Darton DE Jaquez Geer WILL Wax Sparrow SAM Thompson Roon MIKE Jones McDonald CB Williams Wilson CB Chestnut Johnson ROVER Barron Oliver or Hanna BS Carter Coley FS Simmons* Clark P Williams Von Marburg LS Bolinsky Kelly
*=currently injured (I think)