He’s right.
I mean, they would’ve been the biggest snub in historyClemson do finish the 6th place on ACC standing. I think Pitt(4th place) is more qualified than Clemson. I think Clemson is better in the eyes of committee because it has two wins against SEC schools while other ACC seldom played SEC schools.
Big East people are pissed the UVA pick on twitter. Frankly I don’t blame them, but it’s still hilarious.I would have had a problem with them being out in a bubble like last year.
This year -- not as much. But they could have been in over Virginia.
Well at least they got to play in MSG...Big East people are pissed the UVA pick on twitter. Frankly I don’t blame them, but it’s still hilarious.
Adam Zucker is Syracuse alum. He's solid.Missing Greg Gumble already.
You can’t say the NET and Quad 1 wins are important and then let UVA in with their NET of 56 and 2 quad one wins.He’s right.
He’s 100% correct.
About 5:55 lolNice when did you put that one in?
UVA shouldn’t be in. Horrendous pickBig East people are pissed the UVA pick on twitter. Frankly I don’t blame them, but it’s still hilarious.
That was the year somebody leaked the bracket, we were a bubble team and we were on the leaked bracket, it was outstanding!Remember when they tried to spread this thing over 2 hours one year.
Good lord that was terrible.
10-10 Q1/Q2. It's not that bad.You can’t say the NET and Quad 1 wins are important and then let UVA in with their NET of 56 and 2 quad one wins.
Big East was overratedNo Seton Hall or S John’s? Wow.
Portal geniuses?Did I hear that right? Utah St returned 0 points back from last years tournament team and is back in the tournament? That’s impressive.
Pitts NonCon was 337.Certainly for Oklahoma. Not sure if Pitt had enough either way -- that being said if VIrginia had enough, then you could be right about Pitt too.
But ACC did well in the past five years even NET showed the conference is in down years. So to be safe, the committee does offer ACC five bids as usual. I think five is the minimal number for ACC.UVA shouldn’t be in. Horrendous pick
Big East people are pissed the UVA pick on twitter. Frankly I don’t blame them, but it’s still hilarious.
2-7 in quad one though with a NET of 56. I think Providence, Indiana st. and St. John’s all have legitimate gripes. Maybe even Seton Hall. The BE schools all have at least 4 quad ones with St. John’s having a significant higher NET. And this is coming from someone ecstatic the BE schools are out.10-10 Q1/Q2. It's not that bad.
Pitts NonCon was 337.
Would have only been 4 if NCST didn’t win the ACCT.But ACC did well in the past five years even NET showed the conference is in down years. So to be safe, the committee does offer ACC five bids as usual. I think five is the minimal number for ACC.