CuseOnly
All American
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2012
- Messages
- 6,320
- Like
- 6,393
I'll admit that based upon the ratings only, I was wrong [even if those ratings are patently goofy, in historical retrospect]. But I think it was pretty clear what I was implying, so allow me to rebut:
#1, you moved the goal posts to incorporate "on or about" logic. Based upon raw rankings alone, Skout only had three times when classes were ranked higher. One was the vastly overrated class of 2007, spearheaded by 4-star Andrey Baskin and Romale Tucker. So that rating is bunk. If you subtract them from the equation, since neither came close to playing a down, that rating drops precipitously. Another was at 49--BFD--and the other one was 13 years ago and a total outlier to the rest of the data.
#2, Rivals is the equivalent of Lindey's magazine in terms of credibility. So while it is not surprising that their rating for the class of 2015 was out of whack, it actually undermines your credibility to point to their ratings as a source of "truth."
I'm actually very surprised that 2.4.7 rated the class of 2014 higher than our class of 2015, because in general they tend to be better than the other recruiting services. But make no mistake: the offer lists of our prospects is an even better barometer, and at no time since the Coach P era have we begun to garner prospects with the same level of national caliber offers as in the class of 2015 [and 2016]. Anomander's point above is when you land good classes, good results follow. And he is 100% right. The class of 2015 was our best class in more than 15 years, bar none. They began demonstrating that last night, and they will continue to prove it throughout the year.
Classes like that help you turn the corner. Classes like 2007, 2005, etc. do not. The results on the field bear that out.
Pick at them all you want, but they are the rankings, that you were making your comment based upon, now you yourself are picking them apart.
1- I didn't set the goalposts in the first place, you did. Not the best class according to the rankings. Keep in mind that our ranking for this class included Marqise Blair, our highest rated recruit that didn't make it here either.
2- Your opinion of Rovals is irrelevant, they have rankings which I used to prove my point. I never used the word "truth" that I recall, ever in our conversations.
In any case, we are arguing for nothing. We both like this class, I liked it before and my thoughts were confirmed last night that they may be the best class. Just proves that the services and ranking are worthless IMO. This just proves what I already knew. I watched ALL their tapes, especially Fredericks and figured he would be a stud...and he is.
This class also shows that the staff has an eye for talent, including talent that can contribute right away as well as develop into program changers IMO. It is fun to watch.