Syracuse football defensive tackle Steven Clark's career put in jeopardy by blood clots | Page 31 | Syracusefan.com

Syracuse football defensive tackle Steven Clark's career put in jeopardy by blood clots

Status
Not open for further replies.
Exactly. It's the stakeholders that supercede the AD and Tucker that I'm refering to. If Tucker is acting with the conservative approach they prefer, no changes will ever take place.

I get that a MD independent of the AD is necessary. Obviously, it exists to protect players against self serving coaches and ADs that don't care about a player's well being. It's obvious that pendulum has swung way too far in the opposite direction here.
And that is the fault of the NCAA. They attempted to put in place, as you stated a procedure for dqs that would protect the athlete, unfortunately it didn't go far enough and provide for healthcare advocates for the player or an appeal process.
 
At the end of the day, this is a great example of the litigious society that we live in today. Clark is DQ'ed by a GP who happens to be the team physician, not a sports medicine doc. There are 3 other highly-respected hematologists in the country saying he is fine to play. Tucker, whether to protect himself or the university or most likely both, gets one recommendation from a local hematologist and that's that. DQ'ed. Decision made.

At the end of the day, the player and his parents should be able to sign a waiver indemnifying all of the doctors and SU. It's really that simple, but due to the "sue happy" world we're in, it's slightly more convoluted than that... even though it should be as straightforward as I just laid out.

Best of luck to the Clark Family (and for SU Football).
 
At the end of the day, this is a great example of the litigious society that we live in today. Clark is DQ'ed by a GP who happens to be the team physician, not a sports medicine doc. There are 3 other highly-respected hematologists in the country saying he is fine to play. Tucker, whether to protect himself or the university or most likely both, gets one recommendation from a local hematologist and that's that. DQ'ed. Decision made.

At the end of the day, the player and his parents should be able to sign a waiver indemnifying all of the doctors and SU. It's really that simple, but due to the "sue happy" world we're in, it's slightly more convoluted than that... even though it should be as straightforward as I just laid out.

Best of luck to the Clark Family (and for SU Football).
To be fair, you could never get a MD that was an expert in all possible injury/medical scenarios. This wasn't an injury with a bum knee or torn up shoulder, which is generally the type of problem that is typically thought of with sports medicine. Having said that, that is the very reason he, or any single physician in Tucker's position, should defer to the expertise of specialists, most of which wouldn't be considered sports medicine docs. A better set up would probably be to have a board of physicians that would include a cardiologist, neurologist, orthopedist, etc.
 
To be fair, you could never get a MD that was an expert in all possible injury/medical scenarios. This wasn't an injury with a bum knee or torn up shoulder, which is generally the type of problem that is typically thought of with sports medicine. Having said that, that is the very reason he, or any single physician in Tucker's position, should defer to the expertise of specialists, most of which wouldn't be considered sports medicine docs. A better set up would probably be to have a board of physicians that would include a cardiologist, neurologist, orthopedist, etc.
Isn't that what he did but the issue was he sided with the specialist he was comfortable with?
 
Isn't that what he did but the issue was he sided with the specialist he was comfortable with?
I suppose. However, it seems like he was looking for a conformation of his own opinion versus gathering information to form an objective opinion.
 
Oh man, what a huge recruiting day this could be if by some miracle we got Mr. Clark back for 2017. Like massive! It would solidify our interior DL, allow us to redshirt Harper... so many positives could be generated from today. Fingers crossed.
 
Oh man, what a huge recruiting day this could be if by some miracle we got Mr. Clark back for 2017. Like massive! It would solidify our interior DL, allow us to redshirt Harper... so many positives could be generated from today. Fingers crossed.
Has another hearing been scheduled or something else I haven't heard about? I read the article stating that he was now considering transferring if he was not allowed to play. Any input would be greatly appreciated. I have always been pulling for this kid.
 
Has another hearing been scheduled or something else I haven't heard about? I read the article stating that he was now considering transferring if he was not allowed to play. Any input would be greatly appreciated. I have always been pulling for this kid.

After clearance from a third specialist, this one in Rochester, Tucker has granted Steven another consult. Keep your fingers crossed that Tucker changes his mind.
 
I find it extremely unlikely we will hear anything at all today from the school. If there is silence today on the family's end, I'd consider it a hopeful sign. But I'm just spitballing.
 
At the end of the day, this is a great example of the litigious society that we live in today. Clark is DQ'ed by a GP who happens to be the team physician, not a sports medicine doc. There are 3 other highly-respected hematologists in the country saying he is fine to play. Tucker, whether to protect himself or the university or most likely both, gets one recommendation from a local hematologist and that's that. DQ'ed. Decision made.

At the end of the day, the player and his parents should be able to sign a waiver indemnifying all of the doctors and SU. It's really that simple, but due to the "sue happy" world we're in, it's slightly more convoluted than that... even though it should be as straightforward as I just laid out.

Best of luck to the Clark Family (and for SU Football).
Unfortunately it's not that simple. iIRC SU "caused" the problem that led to the clotting.

Second, it's not just legal risk here, its reputational. Look at what the concussion stuff has brought down on the NFL. If something happened to a player that had been cleared in this scenario there would be too much bad press to think about. And you can't really mitigate that.

That is why none of the orgs put their neck out on appeals etc.
 
Last edited:
I find it extremely unlikely we will hear anything at all today from the school. If there is silence today on the family's end, I'd consider it a hopeful sign. But I'm just spitballing.

b549bab0e6b14bfc9901041866717351.jpg
 
Isn't that what he did but the issue was he sided with the specialist he was comfortable with?

Yeh...part of the St Joe's med mafia. Comparing St Joe's with U of R Strong memorial is like comparing the Catskills with the Himalayas
 
If the kid shouldn't play then fine but Tucker owes a thorough reasoning why not if he feels that way.
It's not about the kid it's about the procedure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Friday for Football
Replies
3
Views
541
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Wednesday for Football
Replies
2
Views
546
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Monday for Football
Replies
7
Views
784
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Thursday for Football
Replies
8
Views
769

Forum statistics

Threads
169,404
Messages
4,830,426
Members
5,974
Latest member
sturner5150

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
1,245
Total visitors
1,329


...
Top Bottom