RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 30,901
- Like
- 100,171
Obligatory qualifier: this process is in place to protect student athletes who might be willing to take risks with their long term health that shouldn't be taken. It is important to have an ostensibly impartial outside party oversee such matters, who isn't going to be subject to pressure from the coaching staff to clear players who shouldn't be on the field.
But given the dissenting diagnoses from three separate, independent doctors who specialize in the field that is relevant to Steven's health issues, Dr. Tucker's decision seems absurd. And highlights a process that appears to be irreparably broken. At the very LEAST, I hope this triggers some internal scrutiny to gauge how this mechanism can be improved, and potentially who might need to be involved. Much earlier in this thread, somebody suggested that maybe it would be better to have a panel of doctors instead of one who has unilateral authority to render a decision that can't be appealed. The intent of the process is laudable, but the execution has been questionable.
I'm really sorry for the Clark family -- they are the ones who now have to deal with this life-changing decision.
But given the dissenting diagnoses from three separate, independent doctors who specialize in the field that is relevant to Steven's health issues, Dr. Tucker's decision seems absurd. And highlights a process that appears to be irreparably broken. At the very LEAST, I hope this triggers some internal scrutiny to gauge how this mechanism can be improved, and potentially who might need to be involved. Much earlier in this thread, somebody suggested that maybe it would be better to have a panel of doctors instead of one who has unilateral authority to render a decision that can't be appealed. The intent of the process is laudable, but the execution has been questionable.
I'm really sorry for the Clark family -- they are the ones who now have to deal with this life-changing decision.