the horse would have to be out of the barn for either school to leave there acc conference thoughThe pair that matter are UNC and UVA. And if the BT could pull that off, then the entire southeast not in the SEC if up for easy pickings.
the horse would have to be out of the barn for either school to leave there acc conference thoughThe pair that matter are UNC and UVA. And if the BT could pull that off, then the entire southeast not in the SEC if up for easy pickings.
Bob, I mean this in the nicest possible way, that would have been the worst idea in the history of ideas.We should have built a stadium at the fairgrounds, there was talk of a 65,000 seat stadium.
They joined the conference last year due to Covid.ND goes out of their way to protect their own at the expense of other teams, we know we saw you at MSG for BE tournaments, but didn’t see the Big East logo on your field. You’ll excuse our saltiness as we’ve already been on the short end of your independence.
Conferences are about joining together to have more clout, more revenue, more power. You’re been half in for a long time. We’ve been all in.
I also don’t know why joining a conference is seen as a negative - we gain as much as we give that’s kind of the thing.
I think about a Big East with a ND in football and wonder if we’d still be playing Miami and VaTech.Fair enough, but reading post about how greedy and immoral ND is because they won't do what outside fanbases want us to is just exhausting and not true in reality. JUst want people is observe their own schools greed and self-preservation also.
Even though we are in Central NY we have plenty of cache in the New York TV market. That alone will give us a place at the table somewhere when all is said and done. I don’t think any current P5 team will be left out honestly, just a question of how many conferences will there be, 4 or 3.
I think about a Big East with a ND in football and wonder if we’d still be playing Miami and VaTech.
The problem is conferences work best when they are all equally pushing towards a common goal. Looking out for your own interests harms the teams you’ve entered into half agreements with.
ND isn’t doing what it’s doing out of self-preservation, like we did. They are grafting on in ways that kind of help. If they have another chance to save the conference that threw them a lifeline but decide not to based on “history of independence” we’ll see it as a giant middle finger
ND should do what’s best for ND and leverage everything they can. If Syracuse was in their position we would do the same.
Syracuse lacrosse didn’t do this when they gave up their independence to join up with the Big East lacrosse schools.ND should do what’s best for ND and leverage everything they can. If Syracuse was in their position we would do the same.
Yep.Maybe, it depends. But again we are fulfilling our contract. There was a stipulation for us to join in full. If we did not do that I would agree and argue ND is failing. But we are living up to what we agreed.
If she dogs all her friends and leaves them in a lurch, she might turn around and have none leftThis is one of those totally beside-the-point arguments RE; Notre Dame. Is anyone really shocked that they’re choosing to follow their own self interest? They do that because they can, and why not?
Who gives a rat’s patoot how or why, but they can- and as long as other leagues, and schools, and media entities are willing to give them that lofty status, you can’t blame them for taking advantage.
It’s like bitching about the pretty girl who keeps getting money and gifts from all the boys. Like she’s supposed to say no because it’s not “fair and equitable” to all the other girls? Dumb.
Absolutely. Her friends might hate her guts and she might lose them all. That doesn’t mean the boys will stop sniffing around. Obviously she has something they want & that’s enough for her, no?If she dogs all her friends and leaves them in a lurch, she might turn around and have none left
Didn’t Cuse turn down the ACC (an upgrade even back then) in the early 90’s out of loyalty to the schools we built the Beast with?ND should do what’s best for ND and leverage everything they can. If Syracuse was in their position we would do the same.
Not sure if I am optimistic as much as I feel that at the end of the day we will go from a team in a conference with the lowest revenue in the P5 to one with the lowest or 2nd lowest in the P5. I don’t think we will end up in the AAC or anythingI wish i had you optimism. I the ACC is in headed for stormy seas. The weaker football schools (which includes Syracuse) should be extremely alarmed. The landscape changes have been concentrating the money and talent. Syracuse can't complete with the factories in this day and age.
Loyal friends vs grubby suitors is a pretty good analogyAbsolutely. Her friends might hate her guts and she might lose them all. That doesn’t mean the boys will stop sniffing around. Obviously she has something they want & that’s enough for her, no?
It seems pretty obvious to me that the B1G is gonna make a play in the next few years for UNC, UVA, Duke, Ga Tech, Clemson, and Florida State or Miami. That would be their best move. Makes the football and academic sides both happy and expands the conference into the southeast. Question will be getting the Big 10 stakeholders to buy into such a massive expansion—which will be necessary to pry loose UNC and UVA. I def fear for the future of Syracuse football if this happens. I think the ACC has to go on the offensive and think big—like somehow securing ND and then making a pitch to Penn State and Maryland that they’d both be more competitive in the ACC, be a better geographic and cultural fit, and with the addition of ND the TV $$$ would be better than the B1G.Would you prefer them to communicate to the media that they are nervous about teams being poached?
This reminds me of the decline and fall of the Olympics. When I was a kid - and the Olympics were kinda/sorta amateur (other than the Russians/East Germans) - the Olympics were awesome. All about nationalism - think about the US "kids" beating the vaunted Soviets in hockey in 1980. I was glued to the TV to watch the Olympics - winter or summer. Now? If I watch the Tokyo games for 10 minutes, I'll be surprised.
College football (while full of cheaters in the SEC) was fairly pure, fairly amateur until the early '90's. And conferences actually were made up of 8-10 team leagues in which every team generally played each other in conference each year. The Pac 10. The Big 10 (with actually only 10 teams). The SWC with 8 Teams. The SEC with 10 Teams. Etc. And Syracuse fell in with a group of solid independents including PSU, ND, WV, Pitt, etc.
Sure it sucked having split national titles and no playoffs. But at least there were regional rivalries and some level of parity. (Ga Tech won a title in '90. Even Syracuse went undefeated in '87.) And the bowls frankly were a lot of fun. New Years Day was awesome.
Now? The for profit motive dominates at all levels - including the cost of education. I have buddy sending his daughter from out of state to Cal Berkeley next year. It's cost him - all in - about $70K - and that's a "public school". When my mom went to Cal Berkeley in the '60's - it cost her $50 a semester.
The unrelenting need to always make more money is now causing the decline and fall of college football - at least the game that I love. I really do not give a damn if I watch another Alabama/Ohio State game again. I just don't care. And with this latest round of realignment - it only gets sillier. How much $$ is too much? These are universities - ya know NON PROFIT institutions. It's not the NFL.
Oklahoma in the SEC? Really? It's BORING if 8 out of the 10 teams in the top Ten are SEC teams - which easily could be the case next year.
Bummed about this latest round of realignment.
Respectfully, every top dog needs bottom feeders and middle of the pack opponents. They may not need specific bottom feeders and middle of the pack teams, but need them they do. You cannot Winn eleven games against top 10 or 20 schools. SU knows, we used to have a perpetually tough schedule that.most powerhouses would shun. Having known bottom feeders and middle of the pack opponents makes scheduling and perceived rivalries much easier.They joined the conference last year due to Covid.
If they truly cared about independence they would have cancelled their season last year like UConn did.
It’s such a fraud excuse for them to keep their independence.
Notre Dame uses their leverage like no one else.
Ohio State doesn’t need Purdue or Minnesota.
Clemson doesn’t need Syracuse or Wake Forest.
Alabama doesn’t need Vanderbilt or Ole Miss.
USC doesn’t need Oregon State or Washington State.
I am just sick of the arrogance of Notre Dame. You don’t want to be in the ACC that is fine.
Go join the Big Ten and enjoy that.
Because the non-football schools didn’t care about football and offered no consideration to those that did.But why did you leave?
Your analogy would be more applicable if the "pretty girl" in the example was also a nun.This is one of those totally beside-the-point arguments RE; Notre Dame. Is anyone really shocked that they’re choosing to follow their own self interest? They do that because they can, and why not?
Who gives a rat’s patoot how or why, but they can- and as long as other leagues, and schools, and media entities are willing to give them that lofty status, you can’t blame them for taking advantage.
It’s like bitching about the pretty girl who keeps getting money and gifts from all the boys. Like she’s supposed to say no because it’s not “fair and equitable” to all the other girls? Dumb.
Of course ESPN is behind this.Respectfully, every top dog needs bottom feeders and middle of the pack opponents. They may not need specific bottom feeders and middle of the pack teams, but need them they do. You cannot Winn eleven games against top 10 or 20 schools. SU knows, we used to have a perpetually tough schedule that.most powerhouses would shun. Having known bottom feeders and middle of the pack opponents makes scheduling and perceived rivalries much easier.
Any closed system of teams has the same number of games won and games lost, the only variable is who collects the wins and who collects the losses. The SEC cannot support all winners, there isn't enough OOC games to puff up everyone's record.
The above is why Vandy and others will not leave the SEC. Bama, LSU and others believe the dead weight that is Vandy is worth carrying. As for UT and OU, they have decided that they no longer want to carry the dead weight and would rather take their chances - and a bigger paycheck - in the SEC.
Finally, I am sure ESPN have some influence in what is going on. Someone has to foot the bill for expansion. If the money wasn't there, UT and OU they would look elsewhere or stay put.