Good thing they are due for a win in ACC tourney.Think we need 2 ACCT wins.
Source: haven't watched any basketball outside of Syracuse games
I don't disagree with you but how can Dolezaj and Moyer continue to play hot potato with the ball, neither shooting and finally someone takes it away. And time and time again we miss right at the basket. At least PC slammed a few shots tonight. When our outside shooting is off and our forwards play hot potato, this team can not score.we didnt play poorly , but god we are just an awful shooting team,.
we didnt play poorly , but god we are just an awful shooting team,.
we didnt play poorly , but god we are just an awful shooting team,.
I don't disagree with you but how can Dolezaj and Moyer continue to play hot potato with the ball, neither shooting and finally someone takes it away. And time and time again we miss right at the basket. At least PC slammed a few shots tonight. When our outside shooting is off and our forwards play hot potato, this team can not score.
You have to understand that if we split we might be playing Tuesday and you have to consider Tuesday versus Wednesday it’s not just one winI think it breaks down like this:
lose out - lol
Beat BC, Lose to Clemson, lose in ACCT - NIT
Lose to BC, Beat Clemson, lose in ACCT - NIT
Beat BC, Lose to Clemson, 1W in ACCT - 50/50 Bubbleville
Beat BC and Clemson, 1 W in ACCT - Dancing
Beat BC and Clemson, 2+ Ws in ACCT - Definitely safe
This is the definition of playing poorly. Hate to break it to you guys. You gotta have major Orange goggles to not see that. 17 turnovers, hot potato action galore, poor shooting, etc. A mess.
Think we need 2 ACCT wins.
Source: haven't watched any basketball outside of Syracuse games
@ BC will be more difficult to win than home ClemsonThat said, I think we can beat BC, but we need a MUCH better effort and shooting night against Clemson to have a chance.
we didnt play poorly , but god we are just an awful shooting team,.
You forgot beat Clemson, lose to BC, 1 W in ACCT. Prob 50/50.I think it breaks down like this:
lose out - lol
Beat BC, Lose to Clemson, lose in ACCT - NIT
Lose to BC, Beat Clemson, lose in ACCT - NIT
Beat BC, Lose to Clemson, 1W in ACCT - 50/50 Bubbleville
Beat BC and Clemson, 1 W in ACCT - Dancing
Beat BC and Clemson, 2+ Ws in ACCT - Definitely safe
Agree!This is the definition of playing poorly. Hate to break it to you guys. You gotta have major Orange goggles to not see that. 17 turnovers, hot potato action galore, poor shooting, etc. A mess.
I think UNC loss impacted the teams energy. Didn't look like any of our guys thought we could win yesterday. I expect much tougher effort against BCUnfortunately, we regressed in the Duke game. We played well enough to win against UNC. Tonight we had as many turnovers as field goals. It was bad, really really bad.
That said, I think we can beat BC, but we need a MUCH better effort and shooting night against Clemson to have a chance.
You missed Beat BC, Beat Clemson, Lose in ACCT. I'd place that in "bubbleville" too.I think it breaks down like this:
lose out - lol
Beat BC, Lose to Clemson, lose in ACCT - NIT
Lose to BC, Beat Clemson, lose in ACCT - NIT
Beat BC, Lose to Clemson, 1W in ACCT - 50/50 Bubbleville
Beat BC and Clemson, 1 W in ACCT - Dancing
Beat BC and Clemson, 2+ Ws in ACCT - Definitely safe
You don't score 44 points and the game not play poorly.
65/35 at that pointYou missed Beat BC, Beat Clemson, Lose in ACCT. I'd place that in "bubbleville" too.
The team was definitely not over the UNC loss. They just didn't have it to muster up another huge effort against another monster team. Their young, I'll give them a pass on this game. But BC is a good team who beat Duke, so if they have any ideas of the Big Dance they had better get it together.