Question for those people on here who are smarter than me...okay, a question for everyone...
Isn’t WR usually one of the easier positions for pure athletic ability to get on the field early? I mean I know that lots of guys take a year or two to develop, but not everyone, right? Or is the offense so complicated that WRs need time not only to mature but to absorb the intricacies of the offense too?
Normally I would agree, but the thing about this offense is that there's not a traditional playbook. It's all reads off of sets. Which side is your defender leaning to? Which way should you release? Where's the open part of the field? In that sense, our offense is a little like soccer, where the players look for the open spaces between defenders to receive the ball.
Since so much of our offense is "read based", as opposed to more scripted, the traditional way, "on this play you do this", I think that's what makes it harder.
Normally I would agree, but the thing about this offense is that there's not a traditional playbook. It's all reads off of sets. Which side is your defender leaning to? Which way should you release? Where's the open part of the field? In that sense, our offense is a little like soccer, where the players look for the open spaces between defenders to receive the ball.
Since so much of our offense is "read based", as opposed to more scripted, the traditional way, "on this play you do this", I think that's what makes it harder.
Amba Etta-Tawo wasn't here very long and he had quite a first year.
Don't buy that excuse.
He was a fifth year college player. He knew a lot more about the position than a frosh.
Correct - but I still don't buy our offense being more nuanced than any other. Western Michigan had a true frosh go for 121 & a TD Friday. Why can't any of our true or redshirt frosh overtake gator arms Butler or 5-8, 115lb Riley? Baffling to me.
It’s been one game. Those guys have put in the time and produced at the college level. If they have another bad game, we’ll see young guys.
It’s been one game. Those guys have put in the time and produced at the college level. If they have another bad game, we’ll see young guys.
Riley & Butler have produced?
Sorry - I must have missed where either of them have been impactful over the last two years. The two have combined to catch 54 passes in 43 combined games played.
Neither caught a ball Friday despite being in the game the majority of the time.
Enough of both. If the new guys are more talented (and according to the board experts, they are), then they should play.
Riley & Butler have produced?
Sorry - I must have missed where either of them have been impactful over the last two years. The two have combined to catch 54 passes in 43 combined games played.
Neither caught a ball Friday despite being in the game the majority of the time.
Enough of both. If the new guys are more talented (and according to the board experts, they are), then they should play.
Butler was out 3rd leading receiver last year and a starter.
Butler was our 3rd leading receiver last year and a starter.
Would like to see Jordan get more run with the 1's if Butler continues his less than stellar start to the season. It seems like it's all effort and focus for Butler
Riley & Butler have produced?
Sorry - I must have missed where either of them have been impactful over the last two years. The two have combined to catch 54 passes in 43 combined games played.
Neither caught a ball Friday despite being in the game the majority of the time.
Enough of both. If the new guys are more talented (and according to the board experts, they are), then they should play.
We don’t beat Pitt last year without Butler’s TD. He played well vs LSU.
Riley had a nice game vs CMU.
That’s more production than the freshman have.
I’m not saying they are the answer. But we haven’t seen practice or fall camp to know that anyone’s definitively better at every thing a WR is supposed to do in our system.
I agree with everything about this Matt.Normally I would agree, but the thing about this offense is that there's not a traditional playbook. It's all reads off of sets. Which side is your defender leaning to? Which way should you release? Where's the open part of the field? In that sense, our offense is a little like soccer, where the players look for the open spaces between defenders to receive the ball.
Since so much of our offense is "read based", as opposed to more scripted, the traditional way, "on this play you do this", I think that's what makes it harder.
My overarching point is I would have hoped one or two of these Babers recruits would be ready to take plenty of snaps away from these two.
Or completed only 11 of those 28 attempts for a completion percentage of ---- 39.2%?Has an SU Babers coached team ever had 28 passes? I think we have seen a smaller sample size than normal ...
Or completed only 11 of those 28 attempts for a completion percentage of ---- 39.2%?
Did not matter on a day when Dungey was getting big yards on his running, but a low completion percentage is not what we expect in a Babers offense.
Butler may be OK if it turns out he is the 3rd receiving option, in the mid-range. His blocking is a plus. I doubt he is the receiver we want going long.
My overarching point is I would have hoped one or two of these Babers recruits would be ready to take plenty of snaps away from these two.