orangecuse
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,197
- Like
- 12,964
Yes, really. I think you’re trying to determine the wrong thing using the wrong criteria and reaching a wrong conclusion.
I’ll agree that nobody can conclusively day that OU can beat tOSU (or the other way around), but I disagree that either there is no way of definitively knowing who should get an invite and/or that any test would be solely confined to which team would win in a hypothetical game.
And what exactly is that, the "wrong" thing, criteria and conclusion? It has absolutely nothing to do with my original post in this thread (#22) in which you responded to in my response to Cusefan's #21 post.
He stated he would have a "complete melt down" if OSU were to jump over OU as they, obviously in his opinion, are more deserving. That's fine, it's purely his opinion.
The larger cusp of my argument all along has been that the rankings are completely subjective. Therefore, with that being the case, who's to say that a 1 loss OSU team couldn't put a beat down on an OU team that has shown their share of vulnerability with giving up multiple 50 + point games. OSU just put up a 60 + spot on one of the nation's top defenses. So, to say with absolute conviction (to any point, let alone to one of a "melt down") that an OSU team is less deserving than OU is amusing, again, since it's pure opinion.
That's fine that you disagree that there is no way of definitively knowing who should get the invite, I can respect that, but the reality is, whether it is 'your way of knowing' or some of the pundits/talking heads out there, it's still one's subjective opinion. Moreover, opinions vary, unlike facts.
Last edited: