I will happily tell them that they're reactive. Ray LEwis can beat the hell out of me, doesn't change the fact that defense is reactive and offense is active.There were 15 points scored. Plenty of championships in football have been won by defense first teams. Go tell Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, etc that that they were reactive.
I will happily tell them that they're reactive. Ray LEwis can beat the hell out of me, doesn't change the fact that defense is reactive and offense is active.
There is a difference between acknowledging that some teams have a better defensive unit and recognizing that offense is what controls the game. I really have a hard time believing you don't get this.
Games aren't won if points aren't scored. The team that snaps the ball decides where it goes. This isn't difficult.
No. Defense was well executed, but it didn't control the game. It was reactive. Defense can't be anything but reactive. The offenses made/makes the decisions.
Who said that good defense can't demoralize an offense? I'm talking about the simple fact that defense is reactive. Good defense can demoralize an offense, but the offense still decides where the ball goes, meaning the defense is always reacting. There's no other alternative.Good defense can absolutely demoralize an offense. Christ, the Ravens won a Super Bowl with Freakin' Trent Dilfer as their QB! Arguing that your odds of winning are better with a strong offense is one thing, arguing that defense can't control a game makes me question if you actually, you know, watch games...