Of course it’s a negative post. But almost worse than that it’s a bunch of arguments that are solely his opinion presented in an "every one knows or should know" fashion.
The “program has become way too stagnant and doesn’t adapt” is just an opinion borne out of a “search for the guilty” rooted in an almost adolescent level of frustration over not winning enough.
“Playing one defense 100% of the time” as proof of being stagnant? Are all the teams that play M2M 100% of the time “stagnant” or is it just Zone teams? How did vaunted Duke do in OT against that same-old SU zone the other night? Why is there all that hand-wringing from coaches of opposing teams in the NCAA tournament?
Alsacs has an “energy” meter on his TV that allows him to guage it, I guess. Besides, Coach K spends most of his time just sitting there expressionless and he seems to be doing OK. Maybe we should bring back super-energy Gary Williams, who sweat right through sport coats, or bring in Hurley or some other hyper-active bufoon. If it's energy you want, forget about sartorially splendid and calm Jay Wright.
Lydon was a good player. According to JB we could have Huerter too if we had a scholarship for him. Sanctions have been over for about 10 minutes.
But the need for a “championship level offense” is the silliest of the requests. Hard to argue about that one. Just get a bunch of McDonald’s AA’s and you are off to the races. How to do that? Well, Alsacs doesn’t have to tell us. It’s his job to point out the problems and the possible solutions and someone else’s to implement them. That’s why the coaches get the big bucks.
No team plays 100% man to man since Bob Knight was coaching.
Coach K switched between man to man and zone against Virginia in the second half and was the reason they shut down UVA. They were confused what Duke was doing so their offense and ball movement was off and
Duke was able to get enough stops to build up a lead and win.
Nobody wants JB to stop running the zone. Mixing in wrinkles during the game would throw the opponent off though. We do nothing different it’s all 100% zone and then if we are down a press to try and force turnovers.
We don’t mix up anything.
Our offense doesn’t change when teams are prepared for what we do.
Again the scouting reports tell the opponent what we do when we had the horses to overcome the fact the opponent even if they knew that is a different story we didn’t need to change when we had that elite talent.
Our horses now aren’t significantly better than Conference opponents these past years.
Wanting some spark of energy that will challenge the status quo isn’t a bad thing.
Nobody can challenge JB on this staff like Hop could. You take any criticism of JB like its blasphemy.
You know why Belichick or K or Poppvich or any elite coach stays elite they adapt and aren’t going to do things the same way all the team.
JB is 74 years old. He is going to be he coach for at most 3 more years. It’s going to get worse when he leaves just because his shadow is impossible to replace. However we can be good with the next coach. The fact is our program is not what it was. If you want to say grade the program on a curve fine you do that. I won’t. JB’s stubbornness is a problem just as much as it probably helps him in some scenarios.
BTW ask what I mean when I say energy next time instead of assuming .
I am talking about expanding the recruiting targets and not going for a smaller amount of talent. We need energy in recruiting and that is where 74 years old catches up to a coach.
Also you need a above offense to win a NC title.
Nobody outside of UConn 2011 and 2014 had a garbage offense and both of those offenses scored more easily than we have since 2012.