OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 244,725
- Like
- 453,533
I love both guys but Mitchell is sixth all time at Cuse in sacks as a nose tackle and Burnett is in tenth. Mitchell was an absolute force. I still smile thinking how he dominated Colorado in the 93 Fiesta Bowl.I probably would have put Rob Barnett at 5 ahead of Mitchell.
AgreedFreeney is first period without question.
Yeah. I'm not sure pro stats should matter all that much. 10 sacks over the course of 3 seasons doesn't scream top 5 to me. Clearly, the tools were obvious, he was a first round pick.To be honest, I'm not sure Chandler makes my top five. He was more good than great at Syracuse. Different story in the pros, where he really flourished.
To be honest, I'm not sure Chandler makes my top five. He was more good than great at Syracuse. Different story in the pros, where he really flourished.
I can get on board with that argument. As I recall, he had some injury issues at SU that hampered his production also.To be honest, I'm not sure Chandler makes my top five. He was more good than great at Syracuse. Different story in the pros, where he really flourished.
May be the second best duo behind Freeney and Pettijohn in 2000.Biased but that year we had both Alton Robinson and Kendall Coleman with 10 sacks should be its own entry.
I guess the discussion is how you weigh better vs more accomplished. For a list like this when you have two guys that were both great, I can see the more accomplished one getting the nod.Freeney was better, and should be #1. Green was clearly terrific, as well, and I have zero problem with them being # 1 / 2.
Cool to see Duke getting his due. He was a fantastic player for us, and a stud pass rusher.
Hard to believe he and Freeney were here a quarter of a century ago.
I guess the discussion is how you weigh better vs more accomplished. For a list like this when you have two guys that were both great, I can see the more accomplished one getting the nod.
Reconciling different eras is also an interesting discussion. Green played against more run oriented offenses that were probably slower paced, so he may have had fewer opportunities. But Freeney played as offenses were evolving for QBs to get rid of the ball quicker.
Would love to have seen 3 full healthy years of Freeney.
Yeah. I've never seen a defensive player dominate games for us the way he did.Yeah, not worth splitting hairs [in general, not with your response sufandu] over definitions -- "better" versus "accomplished." These type of lists and how people interpret them are all subjective, anyway.
For me, Freeney was the most dominant player I've ever seen for Syracuse football [McNabb and McCord would be the only other ones with similar impact, but on the other side of the ball]. So I rate him higher.
Good point about the different eras, roles, etc. though.