Explain the reasoning behind the post? I believe RF had posted something along the lines of "What he's doing is not just great, but amazing for any player regardless of class" (not an exact quote, but I think it was something like that), and I responded by pointing out that from a statistical standpoint, there are a lot of players that are playing at or above Ennis' level, and he responded by posting Ennis' assist:turnover ratio (which is phenomenal). I responded, pointing out that that was only one statistic, and that there's much more that goes into being an "amazing" player than simply the assist:turnover ratio.
Anyways, it's getting a bit tiresome to have to defend any post that isn't praising Ennis to be amazing, especially when I agree that he's playing like one of the best PGs in the country. I'll be careful not to post about him anymore unless it's absolutely positive. It's not like I wasn't at the Dome yesterday screaming my head off every time he made a huge play for us lol; I just see more than just the positive things that any of our players do. I would critique every player the same way, but Ennis is the only one that people seem to be exaggerating, saying things like "He's already the best PG in school history, best freshman in school history, gone after this year, etc."
Edit: And RF hadn't added all of the other stuff to that post where he pointed out his assist:turnover ratio at the time that I responded to it, so that's why it looks like I chose to just focus on that one line. The rest of it wasn't there yet. As you can see by looking at the time stamps, I responded to his post at 9:27, and he edited his post at 9:31.