JeremyCuse
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 41,451
- Like
- 53,393
Lot's of smoke out there and comments from B12 coaches about the Bball program. Will be fascinating to see how this works out if it actually happens.
You mean McMuffin...
As I’ve said on the expansion thread on the football board, the ACC needs to be more proactive in expansion. We should swoop in and take UConn and a few other programs from the Big 12 or PAC 12 for ourselves. We need to outflank the Big 12 at every step and boost the basketball product. Reigniting the Cuse-UConn rivalry to go along with Duke-UNC would be HUGE.Lot's of smoke out there and comments from B12 coaches about the Bball program. Will be fascinating to see how this works out if it actually happens.
The Big Mess has a nice ring to it.Can they just change the name because this is no longer the b12
When did Kentucky begin to boarder the Atlantic?Can they just change the name because this is no longer the b12
If they don’t add value why do it? Let the B12 continue to add schools out of desperation that make zero geographic sense. Honestly it would help our recruiting against UConn. They couldn’t sell playing in the East, the Garden, etc.As I’ve said on the expansion thread on the football board, the ACC needs to be more proactive in expansion. We should swoop in and take UConn and a few other programs from the Big 12 or PAC 12 for ourselves. We need to outflank the Big 12 at every step and boost the basketball product. Reigniting the Cuse-UConn rivalry to go along with Duke-UNC would be HUGE.
A number of college sports reporters have pointed out that any new additions to the ACC don’t necessarily have to net the conference a lot more money. They just need to be a net neutral. The point of expansion is to block the Big 12 from becoming the third best/highest revenue conference and to shore up basketball and football as best we can. This is what a number of administrators in the ACC have been arguing, including during the conference meetings. We have to outflank the Big 12 and PAC 12.
Do not think UConn would get the votes to get in. FSU, Clemson and BC are definite no’s. I don’t think Virginia, Unc and NCState would approve them either.As I’ve said on the expansion thread on the football board, the ACC needs to be more proactive in expansion. We should swoop in and take UConn and a few other programs from the Big 12 or PAC 12 for ourselves. We need to outflank the Big 12 at every step and boost the basketball product. Reigniting the Cuse-UConn rivalry to go along with Duke-UNC would be HUGE.
A number of college sports reporters have pointed out that any new additions to the ACC don’t necessarily have to net the conference a lot more money. They just need to be a net neutral. The point of expansion is to block the Big 12 from becoming the third best/highest revenue conference and to shore up basketball and football as best we can. This is what a number of administrators in the ACC have been arguing, including during the conference meetings. We have to outflank the Big 12 and PAC 12.
Then UConn would sue all those schools.Do not think UConn would get the votes to get in. FSU, Clemson and BC are definite no’s. I don’t think Virginia, Unc and NCState would approve them either.
Virginia would be no as wellDo not think UConn would get the votes to get in. FSU, Clemson and BC are definite no’s. I don’t think Virginia, Unc and NCState would approve them either.
The ACC has spent too much time blathering.As I’ve said on the expansion thread on the football board, the ACC needs to be more proactive in expansion. We should swoop in and take UConn and a few other programs from the Big 12 or PAC 12 for ourselves. We need to outflank the Big 12 at every step and boost the basketball product. Reigniting the Cuse-UConn rivalry to go along with Duke-UNC would be HUGE.
A number of college sports reporters have pointed out that any new additions to the ACC don’t necessarily have to net the conference a lot more money. They just need to be a net neutral. The point of expansion is to block the Big 12 from becoming the third best/highest revenue conference and to shore up basketball and football as best we can. This is what a number of administrators in the ACC have been arguing, including during the conference meetings. We have to outflank the Big 12 and PAC 12.
As for the huge debt of the UConn Athletic Dept...that's a page out of the Rutgers playbook.
lol - -- - keeping the "Con" in UCONN since **checks notes**1881
UConn is truly a fascinating case study as an AD with the success they have had all while operating with Enron's balance sheet.
UConn is truly a fascinating case study as an AD with the success they have had all while operating with Enron's balance sheet.
No seriously that is what will happen.They will win 1 tourney game in 10 years there. Come crawling back to big east and win 5 titles in a row as a 9 seed. The uconn way
We know that but the idiots at Florida St only care about themselves.As I’ve said on the expansion thread on the football board, the ACC needs to be more proactive in expansion. We should swoop in and take UConn and a few other programs from the Big 12 or PAC 12 for ourselves. We need to outflank the Big 12 at every step and boost the basketball product. Reigniting the Cuse-UConn rivalry to go along with Duke-UNC would be HUGE.
A number of college sports reporters have pointed out that any new additions to the ACC don’t necessarily have to net the conference a lot more money. They just need to be a net neutral. The point of expansion is to block the Big 12 from becoming the third best/highest revenue conference and to shore up basketball and football as best we can. This is what a number of administrators in the ACC have been arguing, including during the conference meetings. We have to outflank the Big 12 and PAC 12.
If they invited to the B12 and get offered full membership with a full cut, they have to take it.
UConn is truly a fascinating case study as an AD with the success they have had all while operating with Enron's balance sheet.