We need to go back to the big east | Page 3 | Syracusefan.com

We need to go back to the big east

There are plenty of reasons for the decline a Syracuse basketball but moving to the ACC isn’t one of them.

Syracuse was put on probation and lost scholarships.

Other teams used Boeheim’s age to recruit against him. Boeheim was being out worked in recruiting by other coaches, sending assistant coaches to recruit against head coaches.

We used zone defense which worked great when teams had 1-2 shooters. Offenses have changed where teams have 3-4 shooters on the court. This defense also required us to have superior length and athleticism which we haven’t had in a while.

For years we have a very basic offense which works well with superior athletes and upper classmen who have played together. It gives players a lot of freedom and allows for playmakers to make plays but lacks structure and doesn’t create easy shots for players.

Players are now getting NIL that has favored large state schools with large alumni bases that tend to be more local. State schools rarely run the athletic department like a business and frequently subsidize athletics. OSU won the national championship last year but lost $28 million dollars. It paid off for them as they set records for revenue the following year. Syracuse University doesn’t run the athletic department department like that and that likely doesn’t pay off of OSU if they didn’t have the on field success.

Syracuse is also a mid market city in an area that is dominated by professional sports. Whether you are talking about game attendance, tv viewership, or corporate sponsorship Syracuse is at a disadvantage to many of these schools in areas with limited professional options. Western NY has the Bills and Sabers while NYC has the Giants, Jets, Yankees, Mets, Knicks, Nets, Rangers, Islanders, Devils, and Red Bulls.

The weakness of the the move to the ACC wasn’t so much geography as it was the TV contracts the ACC signed. The long term TV contract and grant of rights was seen as huge plus to the stability of the league when Syracuse joined. It now has been surpassed by other leagues who have renegotiated multiple times since then.

If Syracuse hadn’t joined the ACC back then we would be in a worse place. The Big East couldn’t function with some schools playing football and others not playing. Syracuse was not going to abandon football and we likely would have ended up in the Big12 or even worse ConferenceUSA or the American Conference. We have almost no historical ties to those schools. The games would be harder to travel to and the university would have significantly less money to invest into Athletics.
excellent post . well reasoned and researched. you and others like to argue we would be in a much worse place as an institution had we stayed put. yet those schools who chose to stay behind still exist. why some have even won several national titles. so when you talk about money , which you and your peers believe to be the alpha and omega of college sports... what price do you affix to twenty plus years of sucking in conference play ? and the eventual toll that takes on your image and fan base ? what exactly is that cost compared to TV dollars. curious. cuz we suck and by all measures .winning gone . rivalries gone. the thrill gone, attendance down. so what did your money buy exactly ? better seats for the big spenders ? well better seats to watch what ? not league champions.
 
Last edited:
Half of the current Big East is teams we have never played or barely played historically.

Just wait until we are in the B12 and playing half of our games west of the Mississippi and at 9pm.
 
Wasn't invited.

And SU Football would have been irrelevant in the Big 10.

How do you compete with 85,000-110,000 seat stadiums and HUGE alumni bases?

But we could win a few Big10 hoops games 47-45.

And like someone said, our Alumni base is scattered up and down the east coast. Not too many SU alums in Iowa or Minnesota.
Had we not jumped to the ACC there is no way the Big would have taken Rutgers over Syracuse for the New York market. And don't even bring up the research , Nebraska was out even before they got in.
The cable boxes would have come easier with Syracuse and that's all the Big wanted.
 
Many Big East teams have fine basketball teams and lower division football teams. We gave up 77 points to a football team that did not make the playoffs. In the ACC we cannot recruit the way we did in the Big East. It is embarrassing to be a Syracuse fan in the ACC.

Which of those schools built a giant Dome for football? None of them, right?

That has a massive impact here, its a huge building that cannot possibly be justified if we're playing FCS football in front of 10,000 fans. The most likely option is we demo the Dome, move football to a smaller venue elsewhere, and move basketball to the War Memorial. If you think Syracuse moving basketball from a Dome with a massive national reputation to a small old barn would do anything other than signal to the world that Syracuse basketball is DOA...I want some of what you are smoking. If you think we stay playing basketball in the Dome while football loses massive amount of money (which is inevitable outside the P4)...I still want some of what you are smoking.

There is no route to success in basketball outside the P4. None at all. We either find a way to make it work in the ACC, or we become increasingly irrelevant in all sports. I get that there's a huge desire on the part of older fans who fondly remember the Big East to ignore that - but pointing to other Big East schools with a totally different asset base and cost structure as examples to emulate is unworkable.

The key question is "how does the Dome work if we drop down to FCS football (or try to play FBS independent)"? And the answer is - it doesn't, its a white elephant disaster which pulls the entire AD down with it.
 
I don't think it is a good idea. Without UConn, Big East will soon disintegrated. Better help UConn admitted to ACC. And we need to be very careful, trying our best to keep ACC in tact. ACC can afford to lose two or four schools. If more than four, hopefully our football an basketball programs have already recovered to be picked up by B1G.
 
Which of those schools built a giant Dome for football? None of them, right?

That has a massive impact here, its a huge building that cannot possibly be justified if we're playing FCS football in front of 10,000 fans. The most likely option is we demo the Dome, move football to a smaller venue elsewhere, and move basketball to the War Memorial. If you think Syracuse moving basketball from a Dome with a massive national reputation to a small old barn would do anything other than signal to the world that Syracuse basketball is DOA...I want some of what you are smoking. If you think we stay playing basketball in the Dome while football loses massive amount of money (which is inevitable outside the P4)...I still want some of what you are smoking.

There is no route to success in basketball outside the P4. None at all. We either find a way to make it work in the ACC, or we become increasingly irrelevant in all sports. I get that there's a huge desire on the part of older fans who fondly remember the Big East to ignore that - but pointing to other Big East schools with a totally different asset base and cost structure as examples to emulate is unworkable.

The key question is "how does the Dome work if we drop down to FCS football (or try to play FBS independent)"? And the answer is - it doesn't, its a white elephant disaster which pulls the entire AD down with it.
Umm sorry. Jim Boeheim court was built and then the dome was built around it to protect it.

Check your timeline and facts.
 
I find it wild that so many here think a school which successfully drove football into a deep ditch they've never gotten out of while they were in the Big East, wouldn't have ALSO run basketball into a ditch if we were still in the Big East. Or that going back to the Big East would magically fix anything.

"We should have stayed in the Big East, that way the administration wouldn't have done what they already had a history of doing! We should go back now, that will make the administration stop managing the AD they way they have for 45 years"!

Crazy.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
176,127
Messages
5,293,715
Members
6,196
Latest member
NMBCuse

Online statistics

Members online
256
Guests online
2,504
Total visitors
2,760


P
Top Bottom