Agree. I'd rather have a recruiter who might need to figure out how to coach tight ends, rather than a TE coach who needs to figure out how to recruit.IMO, needs to be a recruiter first and foremost.
We say this with every opening that drops up. We need the offensive version of Swag Daddy in the houseIMO, needs to be a recruiter first and foremost.
he could get them some NIL spots in his commercials too.Pie in the Sky choice for me: Gronk. SU ties, would produce a buzz, his name alone is a recruiting draw, no coaching experience but I’m guessing this HOF to be can handle it.
Pie in the Sky choice for me: Gronk. SU ties, would produce a buzz, his name alone is a recruiting draw, no coaching experience but I’m guessing this HOF to be can handle it.
His father played here.Splain to me how a guy we recruited, but did NOT get, has "SU ties"?
Splain to me how a guy we recruited, but did NOT get, has "SU ties"?
So, by this measure - Tom Brady also has Cuse ties?
plus the Buffalo Bills dudes who just visited for the Pitt game?
I know this is a joke…Let’s get Adam Weitsman on staff
Splain to me how a guy we recruited, but did NOT get, has "SU ties"?
Preferably not collecting social security yet as well.I don’t care who it is but it better be an ace recruiter. At this point with our focus seeming to be more on the NE, hopefully he has ties to PA/NJ, but please let it be someone with a solid recruiting track record.