Who wins? | Page 4 | Syracusefan.com

Who wins?

Which team wins?

  • 1

    Votes: 23 79.3%
  • 2

    Votes: 6 20.7%

  • Total voters
    29
Team 1 would have great floor balance, which would leave Melo unguardable, so given that they have the best player and he would be free to go to work(Rautins and GMac can not be left) I think they would win more often than not, even though team 2 is more talented, bigger, and more athletic overall.
I'll give you more athletic and bigger. I don't think I can say more talented. Melo is as talented as any two guys on team 2, and shooting and passing are talents team one has in spades.
 
I'll give you more athletic and bigger. I don't think I can say more talented. Melo is as talented as any two guys on team 2, and shooting and passing are talents team one has in spades.

Team 2 has 3 NBA lottery picks and Christmas - a likely 2nd rounder at least. Team 1 has the one NBA superstar and Rautins - a 2nd rounder.
 
Team 2 has 3 NBA lottery picks and Christmas - a likely 2nd rounder at least. Team 1 has the one NBA superstar and Rautins - a 2nd rounder.
Yes, those lottery picks are more athletic than their counterparts. Lack of athleticism kept Rautins, GMac, and AO out of the NBA not talent (when I say talent I primarily mean skills since you made athleticism a separate category). The one lottery pick on team 1 is the only NBA all-star and MVP candidate in this discussion so he evens things out.

Edit: One superstar in basketball has a bigger impact than in any other team sport.
 
How about team 3:
Rony Seikaly
Derrick Coleman
Billy Owens
Stevie Thompson
Sherman Douglas
 
Yes, those lottery picks are more athletic than their counterparts. Lack of athleticism kept Rautins, GMac, and AO out of the NBA not talent (when I say talent I primarily mean skills since you made athleticism a separate category). The one lottery pick on team 1 is the only NBA all-star and MVP candidate in this discussion so he evens things out.

Edit: One superstar in basketball has a bigger impact than in any other team sport.

Agreed on the last point, which is the biggest reason why I had team 1 winning. But when there's 4 legit NBA players and one team has 3 of them, I think it's fair to say they are the more talented team overall.

Rautins and GMac...shooting is the only skill each of them had over MCW. MCW was better at everything else.

I'd give them both the nod over Waiters as better shooters and passers, but Waiters was way better off the dribble, better at finishing, game breaking steals turned into dunks at the other end in a heartbeat. He could hurt opponents in more ways, IMO.
 
Slow day at work for me. Was mixing and matching some rosters from past teams.

Team 1:
GMac
Rautins
Carmelo
Fair
AO


Team 2:
MCW
Dion
Wes
Rick Jackson
Christmas

Typical Bayhime, even his hypothetical teams don't have a bench...:rolleyes:

Pretty neat idea though..
 
Agreed on the last point, which is the biggest reason why I had team 1 winning. But when there's 4 legit NBA players and one team has 3 of them, I think it's fair to say they are the more talented team overall.

Rautins and GMac...shooting is the only skill each of them had over MCW. MCW was better at everything else.

I'd give them both the nod over Waiters as better shooters and passers, but Waiters was way better off the dribble, better at finishing, game breaking steals turned into dunks at the other end in a heartbeat. He could hurt opponents in more ways, IMO.
I think a lot of what Waiters and MCW are better at has to do with athleticism which I acknowledged was better. If you decide to make athleticism a component of talent and delete it as a separate asset, I'll give it to you. The way I see it, if you make athleticism and talent separate assets as you did in your first post, you have try and separate running and jumping from talent and I just don't see how MCW and Waiters are that much better without the advantages they have in those traits. Immeasureables like intelligence and vision have to be considered, and I don't think Waiters or MCW are any better at those than GMac or Rautins minus the athleticism.
 
Slow day at work for me. Was mixing and matching some rosters from past teams.

Team 1:
GMac
Rautins
Carmelo
Fair
AO


Team 2:
MCW
Dion
Wes
Rick Jackson
Christmas

I think team 1 packs the zone in on D and hopes that team 2 shoots the ball poorly from the outside. If the zone extends, MCW and Dion would have a field day. no way GMAC and Rautins can keep those guys out of the paint and AO is not a rim protector...

I think team 2's guards give GMAC and Rautins fits and it boils down to whether Anthony can create for himself and others.

I think team 2 wins most of the time.
 
People are overrating MCW and Waiters defense and underrating Rautins. Waiters may be athletic but played defense when he wanted to which wasn't much. MCW was long and got steals because of it but that caused him to gamble a lot. Plus his length kept him from being a quick on the ball defender. Rautins is one of our best defenders in the ten concept especially the zone which team 1 would play.
 
People also forget that our championship team (with melo, best player out there) didn't really blow teams out. We were behind in second halves quite often. We just finished games.

The 09/10 team was the best team I've personally ever seen.
 
People also forget that our championship team (with melo, best player out there) didn't really blow teams out. We were behind in second halves quite often. We just finished games.

The 09/10 team was the best team I've personally ever seen.
I agree, w AO of course. Imo the 89 team had more talent (when you look at how many guys eventually got drafted from that team). But a combination of best talent, pieces to the puzzle, and chemistry- imo 2010 w AO edges out 2012 w Fab, 2003 and 1987 for best team.

But then again when you factor in injuries/suspensions, 2003 edges out 1987 for best team , all imo
 
Team 3:
Flynn
Triche
Joseph
Warrick
Melo

This team would be all alley oop
 
Team 3:
Flynn
Triche
Joseph
Warrick
Melo

This team would be all alley oop
Sorry man, I already suggested a team 3, you can have team 4 though. It'd work perfectly for a mini-tournament. ;)

P.S. If you've got an all alley oop team, it's gotta be The General throwing 'em up there.
 
Sorry man, I already suggested a team 3, you can have team 4 though. It'd work perfectly for a mini-tournament. ;)

P.S. If you've got an all alley oop team, it's gotta be The General throwing 'em up there.

Before my time :)
 
Before my time :)
Oh, that's so sad. Nobody threw the oop like Sherman Douglas. Like someone was saying in another thread, most of the time you can kind of see an alley oop coming. With Sherm there were so many times he'd chuck something up there and you were thinking, "What the heck is he doing," then someone would come out of nowhere to throw it down. It was art.
 
Last edited:
Oh, that's so sad. Nobody threw the oop like Sherman Douglas. Like someone was saying in another thread, most of the time you can kind of see an alley oop coming. There were so many times he'd chuck something up there and you were thinking, "What the heck is he doing," then someone would come out of nowhere to throw it down. It was art.

Scoop had a few
 
Oh, that's so sad. Nobody threw the oop like Sherman Douglas. Like someone was saying in another thread, most of the time you can kind of see an alley oop coming. There were so many times he'd chuck something up there and you were thinking, "What the heck is he doing," then someone would come out of nowhere to throw it down. It was art.
Sherm is probably the best ooper ever.
 
Scoop had a few
He did. But that is like comparing Dion Waiters to Michael Jordan. One is a good player the other is the best to ever do it. Scoop became a very good player for us, but Sherman Douglas was the best passer, especially with the alley oop, ever at SU. He's one of the best ever in college basketball. I wish there were more highlights of him to look back at.
 
People are overrating MCW and Waiters defense and underrating Rautins. Waiters may be athletic but played defense when he wanted to which wasn't much. MCW was long and got steals because of it but that caused him to gamble a lot. Plus his length kept him from being a quick on the ball defender. Rautins is one of our best defenders in the ten concept especially the zone which team 1 would play.
Agreed. Rautins was a stud in the zone his senior year, better than Triche was his senior year IMO. But MCW was as good as it gets at the top. I think if we had to name a starting lineup for the last decade as far as the defense goes, I'd put MCW and Rautins on the top, with Triche as the 3rd guard.
 
The General is the best alley oop passer in college basketball history and it's not even close.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
672
Replies
1
Views
872
Replies
5
Views
697
Replies
0
Views
443
Replies
3
Views
711

Forum statistics

Threads
170,325
Messages
4,885,102
Members
5,991
Latest member
CStalks14

Online statistics

Members online
164
Guests online
1,062
Total visitors
1,226




...
Top Bottom