ForCuseSake
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 15,029
- Like
- 20,845
Back in my day, a body check was anything goes, as long as you only took two steps doing it, and didn't extend your arms. I have no idea what the rules are now. The SU guy clearly took 3-4 steps and laid into the Bryant player with as much force as he could. He looked a 2008 Troy Polamalu. I don't think it was textbook, but again, I don't know. Whether it was the right call or not, you do NOT make that call in that situation. Unless it is a slash to the head.
I believe the punishment should fit the crime. In that case, the punishment was "game over". The crime in that case was not a "game over" type of crime.
One of these crease violations was absolutely the wrong call. And, it was the one that took away the goal.
Really bad job by the officials last night. Honestly, I thought Bryant was quite slashy as well. Now we get to watch Miles win the Tewaarton one year, and Lyle the next.
It was a perfectly clean hit - the rules for body checking center around distance from the ball and placement of the hands. Since the Bryant player had the ball in his stick number of steps doesn't apply. The SU defender used his shoulder to make contact with the Bryant players chest. The Bryant player wasn't ducking; it wasn't a high hit.
EDIT - the emphasis in the past 2-3 years has been on high hits/helmet to helmet contact (which I agree should be deterred). The problem is that officials are being asked to make a decision (1-3 minute, non-releasable, etc) on a play that happens too quickly. It's similar to the new rule in college football that allows officials to eject a defensive player for targeting. Without the benefit of replay it's asking a lot of an official to make the correct call.
Last edited: