JeremyCuse
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 41,722
- Like
- 54,435
Not seeing Denver as a selection.
Have to fly three teams out there, vs flying Denver back East.
Ya that seems highly unlikely
Not seeing Denver as a selection.
Have to fly three teams out there, vs flying Denver back East.
One more ACC win to be safe.
Two would be better.
We definitely need one more win, if we lose out were not making the tourney.
Are you assuming they don't schedule a replacement game for Utah? I think 6-6 would still be okay, but from a practical standpoint, you simply want this team to play better, if they do in-fact get an invite.
If they are going to schedule an end of season game it would be good to do that soon. If they go 0-3 these next three games, then schedule a game just to get to .500, I don't think that would look good to the commute. Plus, the teams you're looking to schedule might just want the season to be over if they don't have anything to play for. And look at Holy Cross and the Delaware women's team - these teams might not be taking the right precautions and the game might be canceled anyway.
It's hard to believe that Denver's on the list considering that 3 teams would have to fly there instead of just 1 (if they are seeded).
Some of you who follow Fanlax are probably familiar with the below prognosticator, but figured I would share it here since he is always the first to publish anything related to bracket predictions. Most of his bracketologies have been very close or even identical to what's been produced by US Lacrosse and IL, and he's pretty comprehensive. The big takeaway is that as of now, and lots could change, but Syracuse has a seed.
Well, they are total newcomers on these issues.I guess I shouldn't be surprised but the Rutgers fanbase lack of knowledge on seeding and getting into the tourney is astounding.
Do you mean to tell me it's not as simple as only beating teams with a below .500 record, bada bing, bada boom, get the 2 overall seed??I guess I shouldn't be surprised but the Rutgers fanbase lack of knowledge on seeding and getting into the tourney is astounding.
While there are still games to be played, I think if you drew the field as of today, there is no way Rutgers is seeded ahead of SU. B1G bias, maybe?How about something like:
1) Maryland
2) Duke
3) Lehigh
4) UNC
5) Notre Dame
6) Virginia
7) Rutgers
8) Syracuse
9) Georgetown
10) Denver
...
Syracuse | 6-4 | Rutgers | 8-2 | |||||||||
RPI | RPI | |||||||||||
Army | 8 | L | PSU | 45 | W | |||||||
Virginia | 4 | W | OSU | 38 | W | |||||||
Vermont | 37 | W | Michigan | 56 | W | |||||||
Stony Brook | 28 | W | Maryland | 6 | L | |||||||
Holy Cross | 61 | W | JHU | 51 | W | |||||||
Duke | 2 | L | Maryland | 6 | L | |||||||
Notre Dame | 5 | L | OSU | 38 | W | |||||||
Albany | 27 | W | PSU | 45 | W | |||||||
UNC | 1 | L | JHU | 51 | W | |||||||
Virginia | 4 | W | Michigan | 56 | W | |||||||
Notre Dame | 5 | B1G | ||||||||||
ROMO | 34 | |||||||||||
T10 | T20 | T30 | T10 | T20 | T30 | |||||||
RPI | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | RPI | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
SOS | 3 | SOS | 39 |