ssbriefcase
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 8,412
- Like
- 19,043
You're new to this then, right on..Window is open for a good 5-8 years
You're new to this then, right on..Window is open for a good 5-8 years
I got it. It wasn’t difficult. Very elementary, almost pre-school. Either you were obtuse, or tried to be funny.hilarious when someone doesn’t get it but the other person thinks they don’t get it
So you’ve got it narrowed down then. Carry onI got it. It wasn’t difficult. Very elementary, almost pre-school. Either you were obtuse, or tried to be funny.
i set the over / under on games he actually plays to completion at 5.5
This is going to be terrible. Teams better hire rugby experts to come in and show players how to tackle.No more 'hip-drops':
NFL bans 'hip-drop tackle' at league owners' meetings
A swivel hip-drop tackle will now cost a team a 15-yard penalty and automatic first down.theathletic.com
I can't wait for the replay reviews.
I'll try:New rule approved for next year. Can we get a cryptographer to decode it ?
- If there is a double foul during a down in which there is a change or changes of possession, including if one of the fouls is a post-possession foul by a team during a scrimmage kick, the team last gaining possession will keep the ball after enforcement for its foul, provided it did not foul before last gaining possession.
This is going to be terrible. Teams better hire rugby experts to come in and show players how to tackle.
so what happened before the rule change (as in all eternity ) ? i dont recall anything happening that seemed so unfair as to require this rule stipulation.tldr version: If you didn't do anything wrong before gaining possession, you shouldn't have to give the ball back to the other team.
I assume it was offsetting penalties, replay the down. My example would give the team another chance to punt, maybe negating a big return. It could also deny a team an interception only because the other team commited a penalty (which would actually be the sensible thing to do).so what happened before the rule change (as in all eternity ) ? i dont recall anything happening that seemed so unfair as to require this rule stipulation.
CBS cleaning house.
Making more room for Nate Burleson, maybe? He currently qualifies as the hardest-working man in show business.
Not a big fan either. Amazing he lasted 22 years.Good. Esiason had become insufferable.