I think you have to give some benefit of the doubt at this point, hard to see what justification would exist to ban Penn State from a bowl game. because some horrible accusations have been made? Let's see how this plays out in the court system and then make a determination what the consequences to State Pen should be. Would be different if Penn St voluntarily chose not to play, which would probably be the better poll question.
If we've become a country where unproven accusations require immediate "punishment" outside the court system, it sort of means the court system has been rendered irrelevant and we've begun to devolve into a near anarchical state in which the rule of man has supplanted the rule of law. So I hope you're wrong. I'm not sure you are.