djorange1989
Living Legend
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2013
- Messages
- 16,188
- Like
- 46,292
Dougie!
So if Amba put up such big numbers with us last year but isn't worthy of being drafted, does that mean his numbers were the product of Baber's system - and maybe our #1 receiver this year will put up similar numbers?
My impression had been that we lucked out obtaining Amba just when he was about to blossom but maybe he was the one who lucked out.
I see it as more so the NFL looked at his full body of work. Lots of drops and inconsistency for 3 years and then a break out year which was great, BUT then he had a so-so combine and senior bowl while dealing with a broken finger didn't get to put much out there. I thought for sure he would have gone in the 7th round, but to many unanswered questions it would seem.
I'm sure our #1 WR will but up numbers close to ET this year and they might not get drafted as well. Anytime a WR or QB's name came from our style of offense school all the mouthpieces at ESPN would start yelling SYSTEM NUMBERS. I still feel the NFL over looks a lot of kids in our style of offenses.
So if Amba put up such big numbers with us last year but isn't worthy of being drafted, does that mean his numbers were the product of Baber's system - and maybe our #1 receiver this year will put up similar numbers?
My impression had been that we lucked out obtaining Amba just when he was about to blossom but maybe he was the one who lucked out.
I see it as more so the NFL looked at his full body of work. Lots of drops and inconsistency for 3 years and then a break out year which was great, BUT then he had a so-so combine and senior bowl while dealing with a broken finger didn't get to put much out there. I thought for sure he would have gone in the 7th round, but to many unanswered questions it would seem.
I'm sure our #1 WR will but up numbers close to ET this year and they might not get drafted as well. Anytime a WR or QB's name came from our style of offense school all the mouthpieces at ESPN would start yelling SYSTEM NUMBERS. I still feel the NFL over looks a lot of kids in our style of offenses.
The numbers you get from a system will get you a look , but you have to be fundamentally sound and I guess he wasn't . It's a shame coz this hurts our recruiting pitch . our system let's a lot of guys look better than they are this was proof . Babers guys always put up numbers now when you get REAL DEAL talent out there plus the system that's when we will turn the corner . Cuse has been starved for so long you have fallen in love with any kind of sucesss which is understandable. Hold on Babers guys are coming .
I see it as more so the NFL looked at his full body of work. Lots of drops and inconsistency for 3 years and then a break out year which was great, BUT then he had a so-so combine and senior bowl while dealing with a broken finger didn't get to put much out there. I thought for sure he would have gone in the 7th round, but to many unanswered questions it would seem.
I'm sure our #1 WR will but up numbers close to ET this year and they might not get drafted as well. Anytime a WR or QB's name came from our style of offense school all the mouthpieces at ESPN would start yelling SYSTEM NUMBERS. I still feel the NFL over looks a lot of kids in our style of offenses.
You're being too binary. I think it was the system needed talent and the talent needed the system/coaching. Both were "lucky."
His lack of speed hurts him. In the NFL you need to be able to separate from CB's. Still think he goes in Rd 7, lots of picks left.
The numbers you get from a system will get you a look , but you have to be fundamentally sound and I guess he wasn't . It's a shame coz this hurts our recruiting pitch . our system let's a lot of guys look better than they are this was proof . Babers guys always put up numbers now when you get REAL DEAL talent out there plus the system that's when we will turn the corner . Cuse has been starved for so long you have fallen in love with any kind of sucesss which is understandable. Hold on Babers guys are coming .
Because at the end of the day, these kids are playing college football. In the NFL, if your route isn't spot on, it's getting picked off or it's incomplete.They ding the system for "poor route running"... which begs the question: How do they catch so many balls?
I see it as more so the NFL looked at his full body of work. Lots of drops and inconsistency for 3 years and then a break out year which was great, BUT then he had a so-so combine and senior bowl while dealing with a broken finger didn't get to put much out there. I thought for sure he would have gone in the 7th round, but to many unanswered questions it would seem.
I'm sure our #1 WR will but up numbers close to ET this year and they might not get drafted as well. Anytime a WR or QB's name came from our style of offense school all the mouthpieces at ESPN would start yelling SYSTEM NUMBERS. I still feel the NFL over looks a lot of kids in our style of offenses.
Because at the end of the day, these kids are playing college football. In the NFL, if your route isn't spot on, it's getting picked off or it's incomplete.
NFL teams don't have time to teach a guy that is a poor route runner how to get better at it. Remember when Chad "Ochocinco" joined the Patriots? Bad route runner. Wasn't where Brady wanted him. They didn't put up with his BS and got rid.Right. My point isn't that it's not important in the NFL.
Let's get at it this way:
NFL team wants WR to be a good NFL route runner. Nothing wrong with that.
College team wants to win games and does so however they see fit. Nothing wrong with that.
NFL team dings WR for not being a good NFL route runner. Nothing wrong with that - it's true according to their standards.
College player wasn't being trained to be a good NFL route runner, but to be an important cog on a winning college team. Nothing wrong with that. Player did his job according to his coaches standard.
NFL takes a guy who runs good NFL routes over a guy who is faster, taller, better production, etc. This is what I have a problem with. The NFL should see route running as a teachable skill since college isn't teaching it to their standards. Not as a relatively fixed metric like height or 40 time.
A very interesting point that feeds into about 75 other NFL arguments (need for a minor league, using college football for free development, the CBA being a conveyor belt for young players, etc.)NFL teams don't have time to teach a guy that is a poor route runner how to get better at it.
and as a Giants fan whos had to deal with Shockey, Plaxico and then Rueben Randle running whatever route they want, a lazy route...or the wrong route, respectively, it can be quite frustrating to deal with.NFL teams don't have time to teach a guy that is a poor route runner how to get better at it. Remember when Chad "Ochocinco" joined the Patriots? Bad route runner. Wasn't where Brady wanted him. They didn't put up with his BS and got rid.
If I'm ET, I'm only working on route running and precision this summer. It's massively important to build the trust with your QB.