This is some grade A moving the goalposts material. I mean your message does not put any responsibility on the coaching staff. Yeah so basically anyone who disagrees with your position is a spoiled brat for expecting more. That article makes other coaching staffs laugh at ours. Lester is quoted as saying we couldn't vary the snap count because our OL couldn't be coached up.
Good job making anyone who disagrees with your position a spoiled brat. Man we deserve to suck with our fanbase being so forgiving.[/
Where are the other quotes from the opposite teams or dl that agree with the assessment? Where are the quotes from the ol that admit they cldnt handle it? You are taking the article and Lester at face value. A coach as never been deceitful or coy?
We did have a bye week before the Pitt and BC games. Also he article says it took 4 days of work. Honestly it is crazy you can read that article and not think Lester should think about not commenting till the games start.So you think he could have fixed it in 5 days then ?
ummmmmm it was more like 8 stinkin weeks-So you think he could have fixed it in 5 days then ?
rosconey said:ummmmmm it was more like 8 stinkin weeks- it was his job to make the offense work better-AND IT DIDNT - our futility under his tenure was record book material-worst 5 game stretch in a decade i swear there must be a great lake sized bottle of koolaid someplace these guys are swigging from the excuse about him not changing the offense because it was too complex is beyond asinine-
really- so it was the worlds imagination that we set a futility record last 5 games-You have no idea of what you say. None.
You say personal attacks yet you rely on the coolaide argument. Tell me where the the other team or dl agreeded with the comments? Again I have zero idea if he had motive, but it wld seem clear to me here.really- so it was the worlds imagination that we set a futility record last 5 games-
i just think you have so much invested in your excuse hound you cant stop hunting for excuses-
the real sad part is you have ZERO to say other than a personal attack - says a lot about you
rosconey said:really- so it was the worlds imagination that we set a futility record last 5 games- i just think you have so much invested in your excuse hound you cant stop hunting for excuses- the real sad part is you have ZERO to say other than a personal attack - says a lot about you
really- so it was the worlds imagination that we set a futility record last 5 games-
i just think you have so much invested in your excuse hound you cant stop hunting for excuses-
the real sad part is you have ZERO to say other than a personal attack - says a lot about you
What's almost as amazing is that not a single fan ever picked up on it either. It's not something a fan typically thinks about but wouldn't somebody at some point said, hey, uh...has anyone else noticed that we always snap the ball one 1? You can pick it up on audio or at least read the body language of the quarterback. It's not typically difficult to see him bark a signal.I'm still amazed that other teams couldn't pick this up on tape. Really?
no you dont- the man thinks different from ole mc- so in itself is a different offense- you call different plays than ole mc and tweek it-You play a game on Saturday, you have Sunday off, you practice Monday Tuesday and Wednesday, Thursday is pregame friday is a walk through. So during the season when exactly could a full offense with 30 plus plays be put in and then practice it to get it right. They cannot practice 8 hours a day. You have no idea what you are talking about.
The guy who put the system in couldn't make it work. How is someone else?ive never claimed he had to put in a totally new offense- i have said he had to make the one he had work
rosconey said:koolaid no you dont- the man thinks different from ole mc- so in itself is a different offense- you call different plays than ole mc and tweek it- he was scared to change the cadence for goodness sakes and didnt think anyone who gets paid money to beat him would notice- ive never claimed he had to put in a totally new offense- i have said he had to make the one he had work
I wonder what we did during our bye week? Do you even think about that. After our bye week we had the worst offensive performances of the season against Pitt and BC. I mean it would have been better to not play those games than see what we put on the field. Is that on the coaching staff?He did change things. He did call games different. He probably thought "hey, my 3rd string true freshman QB is starting behind a makeshift line who under Mc. . . . it couldn't even stay onsides - maybe I shouldn't change too much in one of the 3 days I have them this week preparing to go into Death Valley and 80,000"
Alsacs said:I wonder what we did during our bye week? Do you even think about that. After our bye week we had the worst offensive performances of the season against Pitt and BC. I mean it would have been better to not play those games than see what we put on the field. Is that on the coaching staff?
The article implied as much.Yes. But don't tell anyone that thinks we always went on one.
I think Lester said in the Spring that he installed 30% of his offense in the first 4 days and was working on varying cadences on the 5th day - the OL practices that day started by them jumping offsides 27 times (!), then 13, then 7, then 3. (Imagine them jumping offsides "only" 5 times during a game.) He seems to be a very honest coach from his other comments. Also I recall reading about the new TE coach Jake Moreland from the USAF academy talking to the OL coach Adam about some blocks that Adam apparently was not familiar with (?) so I guess that feeds into some of the comments here about Adam - can't remember where that article is but may have been in a Moreland interview or comments - Moreland and Lester played on the same team (WMU) as TE and QB. With Adam uncertain and McDonald still on staff and hostile it would have made for an interesting situation so I take it at face value that the offense could not be easily changed, especially when playing the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th string quarterbacks. I still think the SU offense will be less offensive to fans this year.
Except, Lester said they did.Yes. But don't tell anyone that thinks we always went on one.
He did change things. He did call games different. He probably thought "hey, my 3rd string true freshman QB is starting behind a makeshift line who under Mc. . . . it couldn't even stay onsides - maybe I shouldn't change too much in one of the 3 days I have them this week preparing to go into Death Valley and 80,000"
. With Adam uncertain and McDonald still on staff and hostile it would have made for an interesting situation so I take it at face value that the offense could not be easily changed, especially when playing the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th string quarterbacks. I still think the SU offense will be less offensive to fans this year.
arent caddence and snap count different things?
This story has been out for almost an entire day now, and I still haven't recovered emotionally. What a disaster.