So, about the chances of making the tournament.
50%
So, about the chances of making the tournament.
It's already happened...Michigan state. Almost identical resumes 2 road wins, we have better wins, each has bad losses,both have 14 losses, we are in the better conference. yet we are stuck sweating it out on the bubble while they are safely in at a 9-10 seed ridiculous!
Seth Davis seems to think there is a possibility of Duke and UNC on the 1 line.
I would say Gonzaga. Let's be honest, they play the weakest schedule out of any potential one or two seeds. I know they played a few good OOC games, but for the majority of the year their toughest competition is St. Mary's.If that happens, I guess Kansas becomes a 2 seed.
Seth Davis seems to think there is a possibility of Duke and UNC on the 1 line.
Well if the committee is consistent, then our road wins shouldn't keep us out.The same guy who says we shouldn't get in because we didn't win road games thinks Duke deserves a 1 with 3 road wins.
The same guy who says we shouldn't get in because we didn't win road games thinks Duke deserves a 1 with 3 road wins.
Didn't read all 20 pages of this thread. Wouldn't it be tough to put Wake in front of us, or our are bad losses worse than theirs?
Wow he has us in ? That legit makes me nervous
Well he said he wouldn't have us in, but he thinks the committee will put us in.Wow he has us in ? That legit makes me nervous
Well he said he wouldn't have us in, but he thinks the committee will put us in.
Maybe you can fix your VCR clock from flashing 00:00.this is a special night for me. in another 40 minutes, my car clock will be right again.
The same guy who says we shouldn't get in because we didn't win road games thinks Duke deserves a 1 with 3 road wins.
Well they also have 7 neutral site wins.
I have a hard time giving a 1 seed to a team that finished 5th in the regular season.I think Duke has a better case for a 1 seed than North Carolina.
Duke played the top 9 ACC teams on the road.
UNC played 5 of the top 9 ACC teams on the road.
That probably tacked one or two extra loses on Duke and saved UNC an extra loss.
Both way played tough nonconference schedules.
UNC beat Wisconsin, Tennessee, Davidson, Monmouth, Oklahoma State.
Duke beat Michigan State, Rhode Island, Florida, Penn State,
UNC went 15-5 in ACC play.
Duke went 15-7 in ACC play.
I can reasonably say the difference is the road schedules.
North Carolina won an unbalanced regular season title
Duke won the conference title. Beating Clemson-Louisville-North Carolina-Notre Dame on consecutive days.
Duke beat North Carolina 2 of 3 times. Including tiebreaker on neutral court.
All of this to me adds up to reasonably concluding Duke could or maybe should be above North Carolina on the S-Curve.
I get that, but I also think there's different criteria for different schools. Jncuse could rob ably explain better than me.
Dukes rpi is right there in the range of teams that could snag a #1.I think Duke has a better case for a 1 seed than North Carolina.
Duke played the top 9 ACC teams on the road.
UNC played 5 of the top 9 ACC teams on the road.
That probably tacked one or two extra loses on Duke and saved UNC an extra loss.
Both way played tough nonconference schedules.
UNC beat Wisconsin, Tennessee, Davidson, Monmouth, Oklahoma State.
Duke beat Michigan State, Rhode Island, Florida, Penn State,
UNC went 15-5 in ACC play.
Duke went 15-7 in ACC play.
I can reasonably say the difference is the road schedules.
North Carolina won an unbalanced regular season title
Duke won the conference title. Beating Clemson-Louisville-North Carolina-Notre Dame on consecutive days.
Duke beat North Carolina 2 of 3 times. Including tiebreaker on neutral court.
All of this to me adds up to reasonably concluding Duke could or maybe should be above North Carolina on the S-Curve.