Fly Rodder
Hall of Pretty Good
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2012
- Messages
- 11,010
- Like
- 33,199
In a word: underwhelming., but the staff's #1 target was always jba.
In a word: underwhelming., but the staff's #1 target was always jba.
Neither of these positions is really true.In a word: underwhelming.
Says it all
Not feeling overly optimistic here. Which is kind of a bummer, we could really use a man like Wahab.
So, assuming this doesn't go our way, and we miss on Stewart, are we at least going to get Carrigan?
JBA seems like a nice piece for down the road, but we need somebody who can step in and contribute at least a little bit next year, since Chewie will likely have moved on, and we'll only have Sidibe as a true center, and his knees still seem to be a concern.
Let me ask a precursor question -- is there any evidence that we're actively recruiting Carrigan?
Overly? I wouldn’t be optimistic at allNot feeling overly optimistic here. Which is kind of a bummer, we could really use a man like Wahab.
So, assuming this doesn't go our way, and we miss on Stewart, are we at least going to get Carrigan?
JBA seems like a nice piece for down the road, but we need somebody who can step in and contribute at least a little bit next year, since Chewie will likely have moved on, and we'll only have Sidibe as a true center, and his knees still seem to be a concern.
Other than the offer?Let me ask a precursor question -- is there any evidence that we're actively recruiting Carrigan?
Yeah that’s the thingOr that he even would qualify.
Eh, about as much evidence as UCONN had that Akok was committing 5 different times.Let me ask a precursor question -- is there any evidence that we're actively recruiting Carrigan?
Other than the offer?
Prioritization as you allude toI saw it alluded that we were back involved about two months ago, then not much substantive to back that up.
Which is why I'm asking the question.
It is entirely possible that Carrigan is the fall back option for the staff, behind Wahab. So maybe things will heat up now that it doesn't appear things are going to fall our way with QW. But beyond board speculation -- haven't seen much to indicate that we're actively involved.
Prioritization as you allude to
Tyler Lydon not a true C. He was a forward playing center.What about Tyler
If that's the case, then the coaching staff played this situation perfectly. They prioritized the HS kid they'd targeted [Wahab], and didn't waver on that even as we got past the November signing date, and they're seeing how things play out.
And if QW doesn't swing our way, Carrigan is a heckuva consolation prize as a great system fit who will come in a bit more physically mature and experienced than most frosh.
Bravo to JB and staff if that's how it works out.
Do you honestly believe that’s the plan?
You don't?
If--per above--we've been active with Carrigan, why wouldn't we have accepted a commitment from him? We had 5 [and possibly more] open slots to fill, and Carrigan himself indcated that he's "basically committed" several months ago.
I asked above if we were active with him. Several posters confirmed that we were. So, it stands to reason that for the staff, he's a lower priority than Wahab was, and that we're waiting out how that turns out before we make Carrigan's offer committable. Sounds like that's indeed the plan.
It is interesting because if Syracuse has a “silent commitment” from Carrigan but is waiting for either Isiah Stewart or Qudus Wahab to make a decision it could backfire on them.
It is the proverbial “One in the hand is worth two in the bush”. Should Syracuse take Carrigan or risk the chance of losing him by waiting for Stewart and Wahab to decide?
There is still a chance that Syracuse could get one of these two recruits.
It also parallels to a degree the Julius Hodge - Hakim Warrick scenario where Warrick waited to see if Hodge took the last remaining SU scholarship that year. When he didn’t, the rest was history.
Like I said, this could be interesting (or it could be nothing).
No, I believe Carrigan wants immediate PT. I think he is a transfer with 2 years left. JBA is projected to contribute 2-3 years out. Totally different scenarios.In reference to that philosophy, since it appears, based on several posters here, that Carrigan can help us much sooner than another project bean pole in JBA, maybe JBA should've been the one given the holding pattern? With PC able to come back next year, as well as Sidibe, the status quo remains a constant at worst with or without JBA, and seemingly better off in the immediate future with Carrigan.
In reference to that philosophy, since it appears, based on several posters here, that Carrigan can help us much sooner than another project bean pole in JBA, maybe JBA should've been the one given the holding pattern? With PC able to come back next year, as well as Sidibe, the status quo remains a constant at worst with or without JBA, and seemingly better off in the immediate future with Carrigan.