Chris Carlson on SU & Weitsman | Page 9 | Syracusefan.com
.

Chris Carlson on SU & Weitsman

Did you see the photo AW posted the other day of him and Melo? There is zero percent chance that AW won't be in the Dome at some point this season. He might have chosen to walk away, but he will be walking back in.
And JB was there, too.
 
So to summarize - Weitsman is a narcissist, Lally is a meathead with a grudge and our chancellor is a spineless mute. Moving on……

Johnny - you were always cutting corners with the CliffsNotes. They should have hired you.
 
Last edited:
Did you see the photo AW posted the other day of him and Melo? There is zero percent chance that AW won't be in the Dome at some point this season. He might have chosen to walk away, but he will be walking back in.
100% bet your A$$ that when LaLa and Melo have celebs and NBA players stopping in to watch Kiyan make a few buckets all the sudden things will be ok.
 
100% bet your A$$ that when LaLa and Melo have celebs and NBA players stopping in to watch Kiyan make a few buckets all the sudden things will be ok.

I bet they won't have to pay celebs and NBA players to sit with them either. I would also bet that Melo's name could be found on a building somewhere on campus. Melo put his money where his mouth is very early on.
Things are very much already ok with Melo and his family.
 
I bet they won't have to pay celebs and NBA players to sit with them either. I would also bet that Melo's name could be found on a building somewhere on campus. Melo put his money where his mouth is very early on.
Things are very much already ok with Melo and his family.
Never paid much attention to LaLa but following her on Insta and hearing what she says about Kiyan on pods and shows and some of the company she keeps.

Yea I would not mess with MaMa bear when her cub is off to his Freshman year.
 
Meathead is overboard, but I don't think the Lallys trying to correct the record (in their view) is helping anything. There may have been some wisdom in letting the story cycle out of the news and moving on. I suspect very, very few readers came away from that article thinking anything negative about Mrs. Lally. It seems they're shining more of a light on that (minor) part of the overall story. It probably feels better defending her, but in terms of it changing any public perception the impact is likely very little.
heres is the bottom line.

AW is self employed and the more eyes and attention to his business interests via himself and his social media presence the better I'd imagine is his thought. Like everyone else he's wants to maximize his potential success in whatever ways one can.

So shoot him. It likely stokes is ego too, so what, shoot him for that too if you want. Whether one isn't smart enough to see it, its a win win what hes done in the past for him and the university despite their short shortsightedness not see it. Much like his detractors here too, combined with most working only for others in their lives having no idea what small business self employment and survival is like with the need for as much exposure/eyes on you as possible.

As for SU much like the article concluded they were and remain behind the jones to embrace this reality which is tied up in exposure/NIL, house settlement etc. too short sighted to see this. But their shortsightedness is their right. Dumb IMHO but it's their right.

Much as it is their right to continue this self defeating stance (from a $ perspective that is eschewing another million $), but if they conclude they want no part of him anymore because of the criminal history so be it. Again self defeating especially after the guy has completely owned it, but that’s their right and if so so be it.

As for anyone calling this guy a narcissist they most certainly do not know any narcissists and is 100% wrong. I know narcissists, have an have a lot of experiences with them and if he was I wouldn't be anywhere near him nor on here as I am. So we can put that piece of ridiculousness to rest once and for all.

Haters are gonna hate. In this case a biased hate without all the facts. Speaks volumes for their lack of character. Speaking of hate....the big donor continues to BS and obfuscate not offering up all details. The details of their nastiness to Adam, the continued bullying including bullying his friends which includes Devo.

When they took the initial shot at to adam completely out of the blue and for no reason he did indeed respond respectfully and tactfully with the dm described in the article and as the transcript adam has and shows.

They/she went scorched earth with inappropriate shots for whatever reason (one can conclude why). Their now continued cheap uneccessary shots speaks volumes as to their lack of character including NOT releasing the whole of the transcript of the give and take back and forth (something I would most certainly do in adams position), rather to this point he sits back and isn't responding. his right too.

The totality of the back and forth would illuminate things immensely and the article generally fair minded as it was did not include this point and a couple others (AW paid all his SU debts contrary to what some posted here earlier including security)
 
Last edited:
people are over complicating this. The article makes total sense

Rich people have egos

The chancellor is a nerd and a square. He doesn’t like running any compliance “yellow lights”
There are zero nerd and square chancellors (or whatever the southern fried equivalent is) in the SEC
 
I bet they won't have to pay celebs and NBA players to sit with them either. I would also bet that Melo's name could be found on a building somewhere on campus. Melo put his money where his mouth is very early on.
Things are very much already ok with Melo and his family.
at least TRY and get your facts straight. AW made contributions to their choice of charity, while flying them in on his jet. No $ went to them personally. NONE.

And the horror the absolute horror of the fun show it was in the dome, having this exposure where everyone had a good time, creating good exposure for SU, AW etc.. And the article failed to make another point straight, AW paid all his bills to SU including security and has the receipts to show such
 
heres is the bottom line.

AW is self employed and the more eyes and attention to his business interests via himself and his social media presence the better I'd imagine is his thought. Like everyone else he's wants to maximize his potential success in whatever ways one can.

So shoot him. It likely stokes is ego too, so what, shoot him for that too if you want. Whether one isn't smart enough to see it, its a win win what hes done in the past for him and the university despite their short shortsightedness not see it. Much like his detractors here too, combined with most working only for others in their lives having no idea what small business self employment and survival is like with the need for as much exposure/eyes on you as possible.

As for SU much like the article concluded they were and remain behind the jones to embrace this reality which is tied up in exposure/NIL, house settlement etc. too short sighted to see this. But their shortsightedness is their right. Dumb IMHO but it's their right.

Much as it is their right to continue this self defeating stance (from a $ perspective that is eschewing another million $), but if they conclude they want no part of him anymore because of the criminal history so be it. Again self defeating but their right and if so so be it.

As for anyone calling this guy a narcissist doesnt know any narcissists and is 100% wrong. I know narcissists and if he was I wouldn't be anywhere near him nor on here as I am. So we can put that piece of ridiculousness to rest once and for all.

Haters are gonna hate. In this case a biased hate without all the facts. Speaks volumes for their lack of character. Speaking of hate...the big donor continues to BS and obfuscate not offering up all details. The details of their nastiness to Adam, the continued bullying including bullying his friends which includes Devo.

When they took the initial shot at to adam completely out of the blue and for no reason he did indeed respond respectfully and tactfully with the dm described in the article and as the transcript adam has and shows.

They/she went scorched earth with inappropriate shots for whatever reason (one can conclude why). Their now continued cheap uneccessary shots speaks volumes as to their lack of character including NOT releasing the whole of the transcript of the give and take back and forth (something I would most certainly do in adams position), rather to this point he sits back and isn't responding. his right too.

The totality of the back and forth would illuminate things immensely and the article generally fair minded as it was did not include this point and a couple others (AW paid all his SU debts contrary to what some posted here earlier including security)
stone cold steve austin GIF
 
heres is the bottom line.

AW is self employed and the more eyes and attention to his business interests via himself and his social media presence the better I'd imagine is his thought. Like everyone else he's wants to maximize his potential success in whatever ways one can.

So shoot him. It likely stokes is ego too, so what, shoot him for that too if you want. Whether one isn't smart enough to see it, its a win win what hes done in the past for him and the university despite their short shortsightedness not see it. Much like his detractors here too, combined with most working only for others in their lives having no idea what small business self employment and survival is like with the need for as much exposure/eyes on you as possible.

As for SU much like the article concluded they were and remain behind the jones to embrace this reality which is tied up in exposure/NIL, house settlement etc. too short sighted to see this. But their shortsightedness is their right. Dumb IMHO but it's their right.

Much as it is their right to continue this self defeating stance (from a $ perspective that is eschewing another million $), but if they conclude they want no part of him anymore because of the criminal history so be it. Again self defeating but their right and if so so be it.

As for anyone calling this guy a narcissist doesnt know any narcissists and is 100% wrong. I know narcissists and if he was I wouldn't be anywhere near him nor on here as I am. So we can put that piece of ridiculousness to rest once and for all.

Haters are gonna hate. In this case a biased hate without all the facts. Speaks volumes for their lack of character. Speaking of hate...the big donor continues to BS and obfuscate not offering up all details. The details of their nastiness to Adam, the continued bullying including bullying his friends which includes Devo.

When they took the initial shot at to adam completely out of the blue and for no reason he did indeed respond respectfully and tactfully with the dm described in the article and as the transcript adam has and shows.

They/she went scorched earth with inappropriate shots for whatever reason (one can conclude why). Their now continued cheap uneccessary shots speaks volumes as to their lack of character including NOT releasing the whole of the transcript of the give and take back and forth (something I would most certainly do in adams position), rather to this point he sits back and isn't responding. his right too.

The totality of the back and forth would illuminate things immensely and the article generally fair minded as it was did not include this point and a couple others (AW paid all his SU debts contrary to what some posted here earlier including security)

Syracuse would be absolutely thrilled to have AW donate to the collective. He doesn’t want to do that. That’s the entire relevant part of the story.

The rest - which is where most of your frustration appears to lie - is just noise and petty bickering.
 
Syracuse would be absolutely thrilled to have AW donate to the collective. He doesn’t want to do that. That’s the entire relevant part of the story.

The rest - which is where most of your frustration appears to lie - is just noise and petty bickering.
Yep no doubt
 
so youre suggesting I'm nerd like based on what? The fact we all like to follow Cuse sports?

This is the problem with people like you, injecting personal shots and passive aggressive insults when there is not cause for it. In reality I'm was an AA football player back in the day, now HOF, self employed in business 35 years, big like you and still an in shape 6'2" 250 and can be found the last 25 years a big part of the fine mess/Syracruz tailgate crew if you ever want to discuss this stuff face to face.
OK my friend, easy there.

I was joking. I do think anyone in their 50s or 60s pejoratively calling other people nerds might want rethink how they interact with others.
 
If he can't publicize it, then what's the point?
I imagine most of us have donated to a collective - I thought the point wasn’t personal recognition but helping the team we’re all fans of, compete in this new era, isn’t it or not? Who actually donated from this board to get slaps on the back, public recognition with their name, pictures and stories in the newspapers etc? If I wanted recognition, I’d buy an ad just saying that I support my local team. If I owned a company and had money, I’d have a commercial promoting my company and its commitment to SU and the community. I’d be an SU sponsor including ads in the dome during games like so many other firms already do. I’d sponsor a money making golf tournament, pickleball tournament etc to support my team etc. I’d buy game tickets for organizations like Big Brothers, children’s welfare organizations, schools, military families etc to attract a new generation of fans. I’d buy and donate tickets to be auctioned off at charity events hoping to cultivate even more interest in the community for my team while also supporting a worthy community charity. (heck even I’ve done that). It’s not really hard.
 
Then Adam should toss a bunch of money into a collective.

Or is that not exciting enough for him?
If I were to put $100 or a $1000 into NIL, as me—some random alum living 3000+ miles away, sure, I’d just put it into a collective.

If I have hundreds of thousands or more to donate, and I’ve already been involved directly with players and coaches and recruits, no—I’d want to still be directly involved. It’s an experience he’s buying, not just a vague notion of ‘helping.’ If this were a scenario where a collective had been the first type of NIL opportunity, then maybe. But he’s already had it the other way. How could you feel your money is worth as much when you’re only writing a check? It’s several steps backward. More than that, though, feelings and personalities and some sorts of principles are involved.
 
If I were to put $100 or a $1000 into NIL, as me—some random alum living 3000+ miles away, sure, I’d just put it into a collective.

If I have hundreds of thousands or more to donate, and I’ve already been involved directly with players and coaches and recruits, no—I’d want to still be directly involved. It’s an experience he’s buying, not just a vague notion of ‘helping.’ If this were a scenario where a collective had been the first type of NIL opportunity, then maybe. But he’s already had it the other way. How could you feel your money is worth as much when you’re only writing a check? It’s several steps backward. More than that, though, feelings and personalities and some sorts of principles are involved.
I imagine there are facilities that still need updating, one could sponsor scholarships with your name on them. People with big bucks at other schools actually pay/ underwrite coach’s salaries. There are so many ways when you have big $ to get recognition.
 
OK my friend, easy there.

I was joking. I do think anyone in their 50s or 60s pejoratively calling other people nerds might want rethink how they interact with others.
Calling someone a Nerd is actually becoming a sign of respect in the last few years. At least people that are under 40ish. Not anyone's fault but you can see difference generations at play here in the boards. Old and New.
  • Over time, particularly with the rise of technology and fandoms, the term "nerd" has been reappropriated by some as a badge of pride.

  • Big Think says individuals in fields like technology and gaming have embraced the term, finding strength in their intellectual pursuits and unique interests.

  • Some see "nerd" as a way to identify with a community of like-minded individuals who share a passion for specific subjects.
 
Calling someone a Nerd is actually becoming a sign of respect in the last few years. At least people that are under 40ish. Not anyone's fault but you can see difference generations at play here in the boards. Old and New.
  • Over time, particularly with the rise of technology and fandoms, the term "nerd" has been reappropriated by some as a badge of pride.

  • Big Think says individuals in fields like technology and gaming have embraced the term, finding strength in their intellectual pursuits and unique interests.

  • Some see "nerd" as a way to identify with a community of like-minded individuals who share a passion for specific subjects.
Wait, are we talking about nerds or geeks?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
173,911
Messages
5,120,621
Members
6,074
Latest member
CheerMom12

Online statistics

Members online
174
Guests online
1,073
Total visitors
1,247


...
Top Bottom