Its a big time questions for someone like Cisco, more so than someone assured to be a 1st round pick. Guaranteed money drops off substantially after the 1st round and declines pretty steadily through the 2nd and 3rd rounds. There's a lot of benefit to ensuring you're picked in the first 2 rounds. Will playing this year push him any higher? Will "season ending injury" label push him down?If I were a solid NFL draft pick like Cisco I wouldn’t worry about playing this season in a pandemic.
I hope he just gets healthy and if he doesn’t want to play no problem.
Our first team All American suffering a season ending injury from a 3rd game warmups collision is the most Syracuse outcome possible.
More swimming in the deep end for the youngsters. One area for optimism is that it should only help the D in the future.
Extremely unpopular opinion time.
His absence won't be as significant as it may seem. David Hale was tweeting stats all summer about defensive backs, and Cisco ranked at the bottom of several metrics among ACC DBs (Including one of the worst QBR against in the league). In many ways, Cisco was a liability last year. While he is fantastic when coming up to the ball, he was awful in coverage and got beat over the top repeatedly last year. I was at the Louisville game, and he was picked on the whole time - and got torched numerous times.
Maybe he was victim of scheme and/or worked on that element of his game in the off-season. But the D played the same without him on Saturday.
Extremely unpopular opinion time.
His absence won't be as significant as it may seem. David Hale was tweeting stats all summer about defensive backs, and Cisco ranked at the bottom of several metrics among ACC DBs (Including one of the worst QBR against in the league). In many ways, Cisco was a liability last year. While he is fantastic when coming up to the ball, he was awful in coverage and got beat over the top repeatedly last year. I was at the Louisville game, and he was picked on the whole time - and got torched numerous times.
Maybe he was victim of scheme and/or worked on that element of his game in the off-season. But the D played the same without him on Saturday.
It's a fair point. That said, Cisco had 8 tackles against Pitt. Hanna, his replacement, had 9 against GT. I haven't watched the games that closely for various reasons this season, so that's not to say all tackles are created the same.No it didn't. They forced turnovers, but the inexperience of the youth showed in the run game and their inability to hit and wrap up. They won, but it's wrong to say they didn't skip a beat.