Coach Search Options after Autry | Page 193 | Syracusefan.com

Coach Search Options after Autry

why are we being defeatist? you dont think we can increase attendance with a better coach and winning?
not defeatist at all. and yes attendance can go up. just pointing out we get good attendance relative to others. i will say i doubt we'll ever get back to the numbers we used to see. just not gonna happen in todays environment with disposable income, tv and streaming availability and attendance being down in most places.
 
Well, it's not like BH isn't attempting the same thing. And all Hopkins is doing is making the case for why he is the best man for the job. This is what I bring to the table in other words. Just as we all do or have done on any job application.
I bring money but my track record is terrible. Recipe for a disaster. Horrible logic
 
Well, I don’t offer money to someone I’m applying to. I would (those days being long past me) try to sell myself on how my strengths fit the position long term. Not “take me and you’ll get some cash infusion short term”’
You never applied for a job in the Nil era.
 
So Melo buys a championship Duke-level roster, and Hopkins is the coach. We have mediocre results because Hopkins is a bad coach and makes the tournament from the bubble. (Just like Washington at the start) Then Kiyan leaves, and Melo's big dollars leave, and then we are stuck with Hopkins, a terrible coach, and back to mediocre NIL funds? Then, because we can't buy Championship level Talent, we won't be on the bubble and miss the tournament again. This is how it is going to play out, right?

Melo's influx of big cash is a band-aid, not a fix. He isn't going to supply this amount of money year after year.
 
I know it doesn’t matter but I’m curious - is Hop going all in after the job all about him making that move or others pushing him to make that move ?
A great question. I don't know. But the move involves moving his family and leaving his job. I would think this is Hopkins wanting the job and lining up his ducks to try and get it.
 
So Melo buys a championship Duke-level roster, and Hopkins is the coach. We have mediocre results because Hopkins is a bad coach and makes the tournament from the bubble. (Just like Washington at the start) Then Kiyan leaves, and Melo's big dollars leave, and then we are stuck with Hopkins, a terrible coach, and back to mediocre NIL funds? Then, because we can't buy Championship level Talent, we won't be on the bubble and miss the tournament again. This is how it is going to play out, right?

Melo's influx of big cash is a band-aid, not a fix. He isn't going to supply this amount of money year after year.
My imagination of how this plays out.
 
The tricky part about coaching hires is you are at the mercy of who is available/ready at the time you fire your coach. Last year there wasn’t an obvious “match” out there for us. This year we may get extremely lucky that our perfect match is out there and we are ready to fire our HC. This could be Hurley/UConn levels of timing. Don’t think we get chances like this very often, we already missed one with Oates. If we pass on him for a guy who won less than 17 games in each of 5 full seasons of coaching … and has been out of college for 2 seasons.


I’m sure people are lured by the NBA aspect of Hops last 2 years… but man if Hop went to any other school in the country he woildnt even be on our radar.
 
Unless it is like $50-75m to endow a player warchest that can fund itself in perpetuity, then it is not sustainable and I would still want a coach who can win with what he can get.

And thank you for posting what you can Bulldog, we're not responding at you personally like you're making the decisions.
Schools typically draw about 5% a year from an endowment. So they'd need a $200M warchest just to generate a $10M player budget for the basketball team.
 
not defeatist at all. and yes attendance can go up. just pointing out we get good attendance relative to others. i will say i doubt we'll ever get back to the numbers we used to see. just not gonna happen in todays environment with disposable income, tv and streaming availability and attendance being down in most places.

That's because we have the largest multi-purpose home venue / facility of any college basketball program.

But relative to OUR historical baeline, we don't get "good" attendance anymore, because the performance on the court has slipped over a multi-year span, and the fans are expressing their displeasure by not attending in person. Again, relative to our lengthy historical precedent.
 
I said in the last couple of days that I can't see the losing side being magnanimous and saying okay, I will back the winning side. You didn't ask if we could get the Lally's to do the same thing you want Melo to do. That is what we need. A situation that whoever wins, the other side will back. I don't see that happening.

Now, this is kind of troubling.
I guess if it was my money, I'd want to get to pick the coach. too.
But that doesn't sound like unqualified backing for the program, does it?
I suppose donors can't trust how their money has been spent in recent years.
 
The tricky part about coaching hires is you are at the mercy of who is available/ready at the time you fire your coach. Last year there wasn’t an obvious “match” out there for us.
Bryan Hodgson was available last season. But instead of firing Red, the basketball alums talked SU into giving him another season and an infusion of cash.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,660
Messages
5,275,784
Members
6,197
Latest member
skytop124

Online statistics

Members online
30
Guests online
4,213
Total visitors
4,243


Top Bottom