The ones not following basic guidelines.The downside. If your argument is "That was 100 years ago--we've learned a lot since", think again. The primary public health response to a pandemic is the same now as it was in the Middle Ages vs. the plague-- shelter in place, maintain social distancing, cover your face. A vaccine would change things, but the development of same is no sure thing. (Plus, what percentage of the population will refuse any vaccine, period?)
The Cost of Rushing Back to Sports: A Star’s Life (Published 2020)
The 1919 Stanley Cup finals were more than a century ago, but they are bound to current reality by the struggle against a deadly virus and the push for sports to return.www.nytimes.com
Which would be ~20.000.I posted an article the other day that a study was done for the horseshoe and they only got to about 18 percent with distancing.
From what I have seen, the big stadiums, Ohio State. Michigan Tennessee, Penn State etc. are unbelievably tightly packed in the quest to fit as many people into a limited space as possible.I posted an article the other day that a study was done for the horseshoe and they only got to about 18 percent with distancing.
The number may be higher than we might have predicted even a couple of months ago, due to politics--the "Liberators" have merged to some extent with the anti-vaxxers. In other words, a mandatory vaccine would be characterized by some as the same sort of impingement on freedom as the shelter-in-place orders are.The ones not following basic guidelines.
More like 10,000Which would be ~20.000.
Unless you meant OSU, then yes. Sorry.More like 10,000
I posted an article the other day that a study was done for the horseshoe and they only got to about 18 percent with distancing.
OSU study said no more than 6 to a groupi did my own model of the dome and I get about 6,000 with social distancing. A couple of caveats are that it only included the seating area. Did not include boxes nor the possibility of some standing room with social distancing. I also don’t know how to account for same household fans. Do a husband and wife still have to be seated 6 ft apart? I’d guess with some creativity we could get to 8,000 fans.
OSU study said no more than 6 to a group
Don’t think they took that into account6 in an immediate family or 6 buddies?
I'd say family members, who live together, can sit together. Churches reopening allow for family to sit together.i did my own model of the dome and I get about 6,000 with social distancing. A couple of caveats are that it only included the seating area. Did not include boxes nor the possibility of some standing room with social distancing. I also don’t know how to account for same household fans. Do a husband and wife still have to be seated 6 ft apart? I’d guess with some creativity we could get to 8,000 fans.
I'd say family members, who live together, can sit together. Churches reopening allow for family to sit together.
They'll probably be masked. My thought is would they open the concessions...can't eat or drink with a mask on.that would be my guess too. For any college it’ll be a logistical nightmare.
Seems impossible to police in a sporting event settingI'd say family members, who live together, can sit together. Churches reopening allow for family to sit together.
Army is a military reservationBack to the OP.
With living arrangements, food, and an educational component... How far behind are college sports?
A clear economic factor with Cuse, but others, less so. The same would have to hold through divisions. UB, Colgate, Cornell... and who decides if ARMY can resume? (Please dont make the last one political. Simply a question of local/fed control as they could rightfully be under either mandate)
that would be my guess too. For any college it’ll be a logistical nightmare.
The downside. If your argument is "That was 100 years ago--we've learned a lot since", think again. The primary public health response to a pandemic is the same now as it was in the Middle Ages vs. the plague-- shelter in place, maintain social distancing, cover your face. A vaccine would change things, but the development of same is no sure thing. (Plus, what percentage of the population will refuse any vaccine, period?)
The Cost of Rushing Back to Sports: A Star’s Life (Published 2020)
The 1919 Stanley Cup finals were more than a century ago, but they are bound to current reality by the struggle against a deadly virus and the push for sports to return.www.nytimes.com
If you can play with 6-12K fans you play. It would be idiotic to not capture some revenue if you are allowed.That's why if with social distancing you can only get 6-12K in the Dome it likely wouldn't be worth it play with fans.
I think there's still a lot of guesswork out there.It is now thought this virus has a much, much lower mortality rate. The virus may be mutating to a less lethal virus. I just don't see the need to keep kids out school this Fall. Play football, practice social distancing and mask wear...the unintended consequences very likely will be worse than the virus.
That makes sense but at some point you have to open up. We built enough ventilators, we have hospital ships temporary field hospitals, more PPE...vice ruining the economy and killing folks through delayed routine health care, etc...I think there's still a lot of guesswork out there.
And mortality rates are only part of the equation. If, for example, the mortality rate is only half that of a seasonal flu (say H1N1), but the infection rate is 4 times higher (which it could be, because of the long incubation period and the prevalence of asymptomatic carriers) then there would be twice as many deaths.
"at some point"--there's the rub, as Hamlet said.That makes sense but at some point you have to open up. We built enough ventilators, we have hospital ships temporary field hospitals, more PPE...vice ruining the economy and killing folks through delayed routine health care, etc...
Thanks.Army is a military reservation
Under Federal jurisdiction... however, they will generally follow state guidance. (Good neighbor policy). However, if a state gets too dogmatic than can tell a state to pound sand and they will do what they think is common sense.
However, they could easily limit games to Active Duty, DoD employees and cadets. The cadets are basically quarantined anyways lol
There is. The Boston antibody study from last week - using tests with 99.8 accuracy indicated possible 0.78% mortality. Nearly mirroring the NY study, that had legitimate concerns., including test specificity. ..(.74% mortality) (that's 7.5 times the seasonal flu, but far better than the 50+ times official known #)I think there's still a lot of guesswork out there.
And mortality rates are only part of the equation. If, for example, the mortality rate is only half that of a seasonal flu (say H1N1), but the infection rate is 4 times higher (which it could be, because of the long incubation period and the prevalence of asymptomatic carriers) then there would be twice as many deaths.