Cuse hate is running rampid

[Jasonrob44]

Perhaps this is the answer you're looking for?

Not unlike discussing politics or religion - when it comes to sports, you're:
A - probably not going to change anybody's mind, period
B - definitely not going to change anybody's perception if you act like a .

After spending many years in the past working with miserable roadies and in working with miserable old men now on occasion, the one thing that I've learned is that douchebaggery is the only thing that a douche knows. If you hit them back with it, they wither down.

 

[Melancer46]

Direct the haters to the primer on Otto's Grove. Or do like Marsh01 did the other day and just post the contents of the article right in the reply section of the haters dumb posts on Facebook.

I should know all of this by now, but regarding the penalties...

Were the games that we vacated from 2004-2007 due to the YMCA thing, and then the 2010-2012 games were from Fab?

 

[Devland]

A lot of hate for both UNC and Cuse from Phil Mushnick.

http://nypost.com/2016/04/01/syracuse-unc-represents-ugly-unchanging-reality-of-ncaa-sports/

 

[Briancuse]

A lot of hate for both UNC and Cuse from Phil Mushnick.

http://nypost.com/2016/04/01/syracuse-unc-represents-ugly-unchanging-reality-of-ncaa-sports/

Mushnick is a first class douche.

 

[longislandcuse]

Mike Tirico was on SC last night with SVP and called out the "haters". It's definitely not just us who notice it.

 

[Newhouser]

10 years from now the SU ruling will be one of the main cases cited as to why the NCAA enforcement had to undergo a major revamping. Public perception is a fluid process that is a marathon and not a sprint. Today's haters are tomorrow's converts.

 

[Alsacs]

Asked my kids' coach who he was rooting for. He said UNC. Why? Cause Syracuse cheats. I educated him.

Wait your kids coach thinks Syracuse has cheated more than UNC. UNC made up classes and we didn't call parents because they failed drug tests and one tutor wrote a Fab Melo paper and we are perceived as the bigger cheater.

Bravo NCAA.

 

[br801]

A lot of hate for both UNC and Cuse from Phil Mushnick.

http://nypost.com/2016/04/01/syracuse-unc-represents-ugly-unchanging-reality-of-ncaa-sports/

Mushnick is relentless. The guy must have a warehouse full of hatred somewhere.

 

[dollarbill44]

Wait your kids coach thinks Syracuse has cheated more than UNC. UNC made up classes and we didn't call parents because they failed drug tests and one tutor wrote a Fab Melo paper and we are perceived as the bigger cheater.

Bravo NCAA.

See, even "rampid" SU fans don't know the whole story. FYI, it was one citation that was added by an academic administrator to the paper written by Fab.

 

[Alsacs]

See, even "rampid" SU fans don't know the whole story. FYI, it was one citation that was added by an academic administrator to the paper written by Fab.

If your going to correct my mistakes and I make plenty please make it something actually worthy.

Honestly what was the point of your post? To troll me? If so good job you got me.

 

[nyhc666]

Mike Tirico was on SC last night with SVP and called out the "haters". It's definitely not just us who notice it.

so, he called out 90% of his colleagues?

 

[dollarbill44]

If your going to correct my mistakes and I make plenty please make it something actually worthy.

Honestly what was the point of your post? To troll me? If so good job you got me.

I wasn't trolling. It's a pretty big distinction in my mind between writing an entire paper for someone and adding one or two sentences to tie together a point.

 

[OrangeDW]

Just an observation from my own life. I work in NYC and everyone in my large workplace knows I'm a cuse fan. I can't tell you how many times I've been stopped over the past few days and have been told the following by co-workers: - You guys had a great run but it's over now. - You better start drinking early because your game will be over by halftime. - I can't believe a dirty program like yours made it this far. - All of the cheating is paying off for you guys, good luck.

I throw venom back at these people but it's very sad to see what a horrible perception have of our program. It could be a Cinderella, feel good story but has turned into "this cheating team never belonged to begin with and will get destroyed."

Just an observation..is anyone else out there going through the same thing?

I accepted a long time ago that most people are stupid. Who cares what they think. It's almost a badge of honor that stupid people don't like us.

 

[Pyle]

All I know is after a decade of being felt sorry for as a football fan, for feeling irrelevant in the larger football landscape, and now suddenly having every media outlet in the entire free world having something to say about Cuse Basektball...well I think this sums it up...

 

[cuseattle]

Wait your kids coach thinks Syracuse has cheated more than UNC. UNC made up classes and we didn't call parents because they failed drug tests and one tutor wrote a Fab Melo paper and we are perceived as the bigger cheater.

Bravo NCAA.

I like the new avatar.

 

[pulaski74]

I thought OP was using hybrid of rampant and rabid...

Oh, well forgive me for not knowing highbrid

 

[pulaski74]

just didn't know rampid was a word

 

[Capt. Tuttle]

See, even "rampid" SU fans don't know the whole story. FYI, it was one citation that was added by an academic administrator to the paper written by Fab.

No, he had a paper written. He was told that the paper he turned in wasn't very good. He said that can't be right, so and,i wrote it for me.
I was literally just talking to an SU professor about this not more than 10 minutes ago.

 

[NYCSUGrad]

No, he had a paper written. He was told that the paper he turned in wasn't very good. He said that can't be right, so and,i wrote it for me.
I was literally just talking to an SU professor about this not more than 10 minutes ago.

Was it the SU professor whose course Fab was taking? Otherwise it may be hearsay.

 

[NYCSUGrad]

Direct the haters to the primer on Otto's Grove. Or do like Marsh01 did the other day and just post the contents of the article right in the reply section of the haters dumb posts on Facebook.

Otto's Grove doesn't seem to have a place where you can leave feedback. The story about the infractions left out the marijuana policy infractions. Now granted they can be said to be BS infractions because it was strictly a school policy that was violated; the NCAA has none re marijuana usage, except if the school has a policy. Nevertheless, you can't omit it entirely. It makes the story inaccurate and does nothing to help our cause as a result.

 

[SUMBA]

The institution reported that the paper submitted for additional academic credit was a revised version of student-athlete 7's personal statement prepared for his waiver and that the director of basketball operations and basketball facility receptionist provided text, research and citations to the final paper. The paper's creation, revision and submission occurred between January 26 and January 27, 2012. The director of basketball operations had student-athlete 7's personal statement saved on his computer. Over the course of approximately one day, the personal statement underwent seven revisions authored by the director of basketball operations or the basketball facility receptionist. The director of basketball operations and the basketball facility receptionist exchanged seven emails. Six of those emails contained newly revised versions of the paper as an attachment. The two also exchanged three phone calls. The grade awarded for the paper restored student-athlete 7's eligibility and the final paper was saved on the director of basketball operations' computer. The institution determined that student-athlete 7 received impermissible assistance in completing the assignment that violated the institution's academic integrity policies. The institution issued studentathlete 7 a failing grade.



From the NCAA report

 

[NYCSUGrad]

The institution reported that the paper submitted for additional academic credit was a revised version of student-athlete 7's personal statement prepared for his waiver and that the director of basketball operations and basketball facility receptionist provided text, research and citations to the final paper. The paper's creation, revision and submission occurred between January 26 and January 27, 2012. The director of basketball operations had student-athlete 7's personal statement saved on his computer. Over the course of approximately one day, the personal statement underwent seven revisions authored by the director of basketball operations or the basketball facility receptionist. The director of basketball operations and the basketball facility receptionist exchanged seven emails. Six of those emails contained newly revised versions of the paper as an attachment. The two also exchanged three phone calls. The grade awarded for the paper restored student-athlete 7's eligibility and the final paper was saved on the director of basketball operations' computer. The institution determined that student-athlete 7 received impermissible assistance in completing the assignment that violated the institution's academic integrity policies. The institution issued studentathlete 7 a failing grade.



From the NCAA report

OK, but what the NCAA then fails to note is that "student athlete 7" was SUSPENDED FROM THE TEAM, NOT ONCE BUT TWICE during the season. And the interval between suspensions was approved by the NCAA for "student athlete 7" to return. So were any of the penalties, such as the wins take away from JB, for the time period of the two suspensions? That's not a trivial question or point.

 

[bballbeadle]

The institution reported that the paper submitted for additional academic credit was a revised version of student-athlete 7's personal statement prepared for his waiver and that the director of basketball operations and basketball facility receptionist provided text, research and citations to the final paper. The paper's creation, revision and submission occurred between January 26 and January 27, 2012. The director of basketball operations had student-athlete 7's personal statement saved on his computer. Over the course of approximately one day, the personal statement underwent seven revisions authored by the director of basketball operations or the basketball facility receptionist. The director of basketball operations and the basketball facility receptionist exchanged seven emails. Six of those emails contained newly revised versions of the paper as an attachment. The two also exchanged three phone calls. The grade awarded for the paper restored student-athlete 7's eligibility and the final paper was saved on the director of basketball operations' computer. The institution determined that student-athlete 7 received impermissible assistance in completing the assignment that violated the institution's academic integrity policies. The institution issued studentathlete 7 a failing grade.



From the NCAA report

Thank you for finding the exact infraction! It was a paper, not footnotes. And we were punished severely because Fab got yanked from the team and we didn't win the National Championship. And then we got punished some more. But the Fab paper was the only thing that was NCAA-sanctions worthy. How they are going to square the punishment meted out to us for Fab with the punishment of UNC is going to be very very interesting.

 

[AlaskaSU]

Have patience; when the UNC and Louisville punishments come out we will become just a footnote.

 

[Briancuse]

Thank you for finding the exact infraction! It was a paper, not footnotes. And we were punished severely because Fab got yanked from the team and we didn't win the National Championship. And then we got punished some more. But the Fab paper was the only thing that was NCAA-sanctions worthy. How they are going to square the punishment meted out to us for Fab with the punishment of UNC is going to be very very interesting.

I hated doing papers, and now a paper cost me a national title lol.