Devland said:A lot of hate for both UNC and Cuse from Phil Mushnick.
http://nypost.com/2016/04/01/syracuse-unc-represents-ugly-unchanging-reality-of-ncaa-sports/
A "non-existant" word - ha!Found this as the top definition of "Rampid" on Urban Dictionary and almost pi$$ed my pants laughing.
View attachment 59232
But did he pick us?Adrian Branch gave us a lot of love on ESPN during their final four team breakdown segment.
This (in red) is the key -- We uncovered the problem. We issued him a failing grade and We suspended the kid. What does the NCAA want from us? Was it an infraction ... yes. But it was also one paper and one kid. SU has 600 student athletes to monitor. And what about the NCAA's "wheelhouse"? How many athletes at D-1 institutions across the country get tutorial assistance with papers? Is the NCAA now going to police every single tutorial? Because if it does that, the NCAA might as well start with the B1G and the SEC. They can take that big microscope they used on SU and focus in on the "classes" that UK BB players are taking, and the papers written by all those intellectuals playing football for Alabama and Ohio State (you know, the ones that don't go to college to "Play School"). What a farse.The institution reported that the paper submitted for additional academic credit was a revised version of student-athlete 7's personal statement prepared for his waiver and that the director of basketball operations and basketball facility receptionist provided text, research and citations to the final paper. The paper's creation, revision and submission occurred between January 26 and January 27, 2012. The director of basketball operations had student-athlete 7's personal statement saved on his computer. Over the course of approximately one day, the personal statement underwent seven revisions authored by the director of basketball operations or the basketball facility receptionist. The director of basketball operations and the basketball facility receptionist exchanged seven emails. Six of those emails contained newly revised versions of the paper as an attachment. The two also exchanged three phone calls. The grade awarded for the paper restored student-athlete 7's eligibility and the final paper was saved on the director of basketball operations' computer. The institution determined that student-athlete 7 received impermissible assistance in completing the assignment that violated the institution's academic integrity policies. The institution issued studentathlete 7 a failing grade.
From the NCAA report
This (in red) is the key -- We uncovered the problem. We issued him a failing grade and We suspended the kid. What does the NCAA want from us? Was it an infraction? Yes. But it was also one paper and one kid. How many athletes at D-1 institutions across the country get tutorial assistance with papers? Was the NCAA's "wheelhouse" suddenly expanded just for SU? Is the NCAA going to police every single tutorial now? Because if they do that, they might as well head for the B1G and the SEC. They can start digging into the "classes" that UK BB players are taking, and the papers written by all those intellectuals playing football for Alabama and Ohio State (you know, the ones that don't go to college to "Play School"). What a farse.
The main point is ... we uncovered the "cheating". That's the irony here ... that in Fab Melo's case, the system worked. The student athlete was suspended by the institution. It's disappointing, but that's what's SUPPOSED to happen when a program is being properly administered. They can fine us for the YMCA payments ... although that seems about as close to work-study as you can get. But sure, sanction us for that. But imposing Draconian penalties on an institution that finds an academic problem and punishes the proper parties? I don't get the logic there.And just on a bigger societal issue. There are countless fraternity and sorority houses with notes and tests and papers that are passed down over the years. Or the parents who pay for $200/hr tutors so their kids can get into the best schools. Do we really think mommy and daddy are paying for tutors to sit back and do nothing?
Somehow this kid on his THIRD language is the poster boy for all that is wrong with college sports?
Cheating is rampant in schools across the country, but somehow no one gives a s*** unless it's done by a "student athlete" that, more often than not, is a minority.
And just on a bigger societal issue. There are countless fraternity and sorority houses with notes and tests and papers that are passed down over the years. Or the parents who pay for $200/hr tutors so their kids can get into the best schools. Do we really think mommy and daddy are paying for tutors to sit back and do nothing?
Somehow this kid on his THIRD language is the poster boy for all that is wrong with college sports?
Cheating is rampant in schools across the country, but somehow no one gives a s*** unless it's done by a "student athlete" that, more often than not, is a minority.
No, we MADE our own punishment by suspending Fab TWICE in the same season. The second suspension effectively ended his college career. What more were we supposed to do? Put him in a pillory and throw rotten tomatoes at him?Yeah, I concur with this. I would imagine there are other minor infractions we're guilty of too. I would think the NCAA knows this, so that's why they hung around for 10 years hoping something falls from the tree in their neverending quest to demolish us. Every school has it happening - you do your best to minimize it hopefully, and preferably you're not orchestrating it. lol
My GF said the worst violator she encountered by far when it came to pressure from the athletic department, even compared to the B10 schools she taught at was a D1 school in the tri-State area - that isn't exactly a sports powerhouse. She also thought cheating seemed far more obvious from gen pop than athletes.
Maybe they just hide it better because they're paid to do it up/tutor so they're better at not making it so obvious? I'm not sure how that works...Other students were far more likely to turn in a paper that was light years better than anything they were actually capable of writing. Probably because the oversight on that is non-existent. Everyone cheats, we got caught with our hand in the cookie jar, it happens. We took our punishment.
Now, what UNC did is just straight up bonkers. I don't know if anyone else was bold enough to go that far - Calipari probably shook his head at that one.
No, we MADE our own punishment by suspending Fab TWICE in the same season. The second suspension effectively ended his college career.
What more were we supposed to do? Put him in a pillory and throw rotten tomatoes at him?
Embrace the dark side.Just an observation from my own life. I work in NYC and everyone in my large workplace knows I'm a cuse fan. I can't tell you how many times I've been stopped over the past few days and have been told the following by co-workers: - You guys had a great run but it's over now. - You better start drinking early because your game will be over by halftime. - I can't believe a dirty program like yours made it this far. - All of the cheating is paying off for you guys, good luck.
I throw venom back at these people but it's very sad to see what a horrible perception have of our program. It could be a Cinderella, feel good story but has turned into "this cheating team never belonged to begin with and will get destroyed."
Just an observation..is anyone else out there going through the same thing?
It is better that SU holds athletes more accountable than to be like the SEC and not care whether a kid actually learns anything so long as they ball.My cousin was a tutor at SU, and tutored Walter Reyes. His mom, my aunt worked for SU and was a Newhouse student with a near 4.0 GPA. He always had nothing but kind things to say about Walter and his efforts in the classroom considering his schedule. He also stated that the kids on athletic scholarships are under such a much stronger microscope than 'normal' kids to the point that it is almost unfair. A lot of general students can get by without references and citations on papers whereas a student-athlete is expected to reference completely and without failure. Lack of referencing or improper citation is graded harsher on student athletes than it is on general students. SU holds their athletes to a higher standards than they do the general student -- and we still got boned for reporting ourselves on a third language student that we reported and punished twice.
True. I should have said rotten oranges!I think that, in retrospect - this would have made all of us feel a whole lot better about it.