Idiocuse22&
Scout Team
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2023
- Messages
- 406
- Like
- 931
Im with you on everything you've said other than being close to DePaul in irrelevence.Back in the late 90s, I did a project at a site in NJ (near the Meadowlands). In a conversation with a guy who worked there for years, I mentioned that I'd graduated from Syracuse. He was all excited to talk about Syracuse football, how good they were, and he was hoping his kid could get a football scholarship offer there. By 2006, NOBODY thought highly of Syracuse football - it was a dead program. It took 6,7 years - at most - to completely destroy a good reputation in the northeast.
Basketball started from an even better spot from a brand perspective - but how long has it been since Syracuse basketball has been relevant nationally? Not "sneak in to the NCAA tournament" relevant - good enough to have legit Final Four aspirations. There's probably 20 teams in that category any given year.
The thing that worries me the most is I don't feel any sense of urgency from the University...its like they think the basketball brand can withstand numerous bad years in a row and recover. I'm not sure that's the case...and we're close to being DePaul levels of irrelevant already.
OMG! I hope not! Maybe I am wrong but I think it would take another 15 straight losing records to get there with a few 3-25s and a couple seasons with 0 wins in ACC.
We for sure are in a rough patch but I think if you ask a casual college BBall fan not from Syracuse how good is Syracuse? ... not bad...pretty good & a couple they sucks.
I mean we have won 20+ games in a season something like 24 out of the last 30.
But yes, the University should have a sense of urgency to make some changes.