RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 30,900
- Like
- 100,168
It's a franchise, not his private business. If it was his private business, that is fine. But it's a franchise and a whole different ball game (no pun intended).
The other owners and the NBA absolutely have to find a way to ensure continued growth and success of the league and absolutely will push to have him removed as owner.
A billion dollar payout isn't a bad result for Sterling.
I couldn't care less whether Sterling "makes out" well in the deal, as I don't believe that this should have any bearing on whether or not he is--for lack of a better description--forcibly removed from ownership.
I can't stand Sterling--never have liked him, never will--but I disagree with the notion that anybody who expresses an opinion that some disagree with needs to be taken down simply because someone got offended by what they said [in what may have been an illegally recorded private conversation, no less].
In many ways, Sterling is an embarrassment to the league. Always has been. But I fundamentally disagree that embarrassing behavior--even involving something as volatile socially as thinly veiled racism--should warrant the NBA doing much more than fining him or suspending him, or both. Forcing him to sell over something like this [and I think Moqui has it right with his post from the first page], when such actions aren't specified in the franchise agreement seems excessive, at best.
Last edited: