OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 234,069
- Like
- 425,981
more people needed to do that, ie: jump to a league specific like Eisen or went local with a National tie in like Pidto on MSG and NHLN.NHL should grab him. Hes a huge hockey guy and would be a good fit
I liked to turn Sportscenter on in the morning or at night, just for scores and highlights. Not even specific sport or team. Now, I can't even handle having it on in the background.The rights to NBA and NFL are huge, I can go to YouTube for highlights, and First Take gets ratings.
No one complaining about SC not showing highlights is going to sit through that show to watch highlights of the cuse game like it's 2000. That's not the way it is anymore.
I think that CNN should jump back in to the sports information game. Grab all the good talent that is getting axed and
I liked to turn Sportscenter on in the morning or at night, just for scores and highlights. Not even specific sport or team. Now, I can't even handle having it on in the background.
So, it looks like the execs at ESPN have no clue what their viewers want. That is probably why Wildhack jumped on the first lifeboat.
So, does the one that approved these bad deals get fired, or possibly take a reduction in pay? I am guessing no to both, in fact, he probably accepted a bonus that would pay 2 or 3 or more of these folks for a year.The ESPN NBA and MLB TV contracts they just signed were awful deals. ESPN drastically over paid for these rights.
Disney is making ESPN cut off expenses.
I don't disagree with you. I think John Skipper is a joke.So, does the one that approved these bad deals get fired, or possibly take a reduction in pay? I am guessing no to both, in fact, he probably accepted a bonus that would pay 2 or 3 or more of these folks for a year.
You are right, I check scores on my phone often. But, when I get home and I sit down, I would rather look at my TV. I am probably in the minority, and I understand that. And the fact is that NFL/MLB/NBA networks do it better, is not the issue, because it is up to ESPN to then up their game and do it better, instead they make it a bunch of crap. They have to fill that time with something, they have to figure out what people want to see and then provide that. I am not sure what it is, but they are driving people away.I don't think most people consume sports like that anymore though. I can see the score of any game or any highlight whenever I want. And that doesn't even get into NFL/MLB/NBA networks who all do it better than SC.
The rights to NBA and NFL are huge, I can go to YouTube for highlights, and First Take gets ratings.
No one complaining about SC not showing highlights is going to sit through that show to watch highlights of the cuse game like it's 2000. That's not the way it is anymore.
Now that I think of it I literally have not watched a minute of SC since 2014.
It's hotel room background noise.
Thanks. I was trying to show that I was a little bit compassionate but I'm good with your fix.FIFY
No because ESPN will profit from the agreement and got an extension on game rights to do it.Since ESPN is the backbone of the upcoming ACC Network, is this development concerning?
I don't disagree with you. I think John Skipper is a joke.
Skipper has allowed politics to infest ESPN that is on him.
He wants to allow the perception of the network to tilt left that has hurt them.
Possibly meaning that we won't have to listen to Corey Alexander or LaPhonso Ellis.Since ESPN is the backbone of the upcoming ACC Network, is this development concerning?
Politics plays a very minor role. It's TV habits and the internet that's eating away at their viewership.
Yeah no one's calling to cancel because Caitlin Jenner won a espy
And those heels!!! Oy, you try being built like a linebacker and walking in 5 inch heels.Well, she worked hard for that award. She cut her dork off to win it. I ain't doing that.