Ragman2000
Pee-Trough Advocate
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 2,252
- Like
- 8,227
It was worth it, I legit snorted out loud at that one.D'oh!
It was worth it, I legit snorted out loud at that one.D'oh!
Is this a trick? All anyone needs to know is $, and how much some have and are willing to allocate to talent in an open market. A market they've been priced out of, at least this one, Early and visible time.Yup. Do you know the reason(s) why and how that could have been remedied?
not even close. Judah on the other hand is a player we have to keep. Losing him would be a disaster.Is Jesse Edwards a “break the bank at all costs player”?
It’s hard for us to know what the cutoff should be and what the plans are.
Many people know what happened. They’re writing about it in this thread.How do you know what really happened? You don't know but somehow you feel compelled to cast dispersions when you are clearly guessing about their relationship.
Is this a trick? All anyone needs to know is $, and how much some have and are willing to allocate to talent in an open market. A market they've been priced out of, at least this one, Early and visible time.
Anything else?
There’s a difference between not being able to pay for something, and choosing not to pay for something.Is this a trick? All anyone needs to know is $, and how much some have and are willing to allocate to talent in an open market. A market they've been priced out of, at least this one, Early and visible time.
Anything else?
Aka, the collective need$ to do more. We've gone in a circle. Because if you think these kids will just fulfill their scholarship "obligations" out of some loyalty element for half what a competitor is paying, you'll continue to fall behind. I think Jesse in this case was worth whatever he needed to $tay. Corner$tone player for another year with the right piece$ around him to be formidable. We can revi$it in January or March when WVU is a top 3 $eed.Yeah so the solution is “throw more money at it,” as if we aren’t talking about finite resources from a finite group of donors. And I don’t think that every player we happen to like or see value in should just get to name their price. There are limits, even if the pockets are deeper.
I couldn't agree more, and I disagree with their valuation in this case. It's the difference between NIT bubble, and seeding discussion. That has to be > $400 in valueThere’s a difference between not being able to pay for something, and choosing not to pay for something.
It’s not just a valuation. It’s also about dealing with someone who’s not honest or someone to be trusted.I couldn't agree more, and I disagree with their valuation in this case. It's the difference between NIT bubble, and seeding discussion. That has to be > $400 in value
That also factors in, of course. Do tell...It’s not just a valuation. It’s also about dealing with someone who’s not honest or someone to be trusted.
Aka, the collective need$ to do more. We've gone in a circle. Because if you think these kids will just fulfill their scholarship "obligations" out of some loyalty element for half what a competitor is paying, you'll continue to fall behind. I think Jesse in this case was worth whatever he needed to $tay. Corner$tone player for another year with the right piece$ around him to be formidable. We can revi$it in January or March when WVU is a top 3 $eed.
I think one issue for me is the source of monies being injected into the system. There are several entities that profit from the entertainment provided by displays of athletic prowess, but they're not the ones paying NIL royalties to players. Soft money is coming from boosters specifically to influence players' decisions, not to compensate them for the use of their name, image, or likeness. Seems counterintuitive and contrary to the stated purpose of NIL.Yeah so the solution is “throw more money at it,” as if we aren’t talking about finite resources from a finite group of donors. And I don’t think that every player we happen to like or see value in should just get to name their price. There are limits, even if the pockets are deeper.
A 5th year player with his stats and post season awards? Really? You can't replace him as easily as your wounded pride might suggestWhat if he’s not a cornerstone player though?
Why can't those entertainment interests "donate" to a collective?I think one issue for me is the source of monies being injected into the system. There are several entities that profit from the entertainment provided by displays of athletic prowess, but they're not the ones paying NIL royalties to players. Soft money is coming from boosters specifically to influence players' decisions, not to compensate them for the use of their name, image, or likeness. Seems counterintuitive and contrary to the stated purpose of NIL.
Will be*not even close. Judah on the other hand is a player we have to keep. Losing him would be a disaster.
Payable upon clearing customs in Israel?I'm still waiting for someone to chime in with how SU planned on paying Jesse given his visa status.
A 5th year player with his stats and post season awards? Really? You can't replace him as easily as your wounded pride might suggest
Aka, the collective need$ to do more. We've gone in a circle. Because if you think these kids will just fulfill their scholarship "obligations" out of some loyalty element for half what a competitor is paying, you'll continue to fall behind. I think Jesse in this case was worth whatever he needed to $tay. Corner$tone player for another year with the right piece$ around him to be formidable. We can revi$it in January or March when WVU is a top 3 $eed.
What would Billy Celuck cost in NIL? Some gift cards to Bob Evans ?Is Jesse Edwards a “break the bank at all costs player”?
It’s hard for us to know what the cutoff should be and what the plans are.
Because its trashy and I know Syracuse basketball has that money to give to a player they deem worthy. We know he’s not, Cuse knows hes not, Jesse thinks he is.You guys don’t think he made those comments because it might actually be reality ? Just curious why there’s so many issues with what he said… fire away lol
If the collective for Syracuse University athletics could benefit from my persinal infusion, and from those I bring with me, the sky truly is fallingRight, we’ve also come full circle as to telling other people how to spend their money. The great thing about these collectives is that you don’t need to be a major donor to have an impact. You can also recruit donors to contribute to the collective. So have at it. Then we can start writing blank checks to kids.
The final four was Miami, UConn, San Diego St, and Florida Atlantic.Once the fig leaf of NIL came in to excuse pay for play the floodgates opened. The new reality isn’t one SU ( more accurately SU’s boosters) can consistently compete in at a high level. Few private schools can.
I’d be more impressed with an administration that was thoughtfully planning for what happens when 40 or so schools effectively break away to become semi-pro football and basketball programs. That while keeping in mind that their primary focus is running and hopefully improving an academic institution.