MikeSU02
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 13,271
- Like
- 49,743
Nothing a 2-3 zone wouldn't cure.
Take a page out of Kerr's playbook and run Box and 1, 3-2, etc. Haha.
I mean, they should try everything.
Nothing a 2-3 zone wouldn't cure.
and Magic too.They have 15 people with giant egos pitching ideas to Jeannie Buss. Phil, Rambis, Pelinka, Bron + all the Klutch people - I would wager there were some other names that would surprise people that were at least thrown around for a hot minute.
Lakers are a mess at the top of the org.
and Magic too.
AgreeThey have 15 people with giant egos pitching ideas to Jeannie Buss. Phil, Rambis, Pelinka, Bron + all the Klutch people - I would wager there were some other names that would surprise people that were at least thrown around for a hot minute.
Lakers are a mess at the top of the org.
LeBron James is a coach killer. He’s not the player he used to be. He takes half of the defensive possessions off. He thinks he’s a GM, coach and player. He’s only won when he’s been surrounded with an abundance of talent. He’s never been on a team that has been developed. He doesn’t listen and he does what he wants. Besides the money, I don’t see why anyone would want that job.
1. That’s true for literally anyone that’s won an NBA championship. I hate that argument. People use it against Boeheim too.LeBron James is a coach killer. He’s not the player he used to be. He takes half of the defensive possessions off. He thinks he’s a GM, coach and player. He’s only won when he’s been surrounded with an abundance of talent. He’s never been on a team that has been developed. He doesn’t listen and he does what he wants. Besides the money, I don’t see why anyone would want that job.
That meathead Russillo always says LeBron should have a 1/2 ring for that 2007 finals appearance.1. That’s true for literally anyone that’s won an NBA championship. I hate that argument. People use it against Boeheim too.
2. Take a look at that ‘07 Cavs team that went to the finals. That team probably doesn’t win 20 games if you take LeBron off it.
FIFY2. Take a look at that ‘07 Cavs team that went to the finals. That team probably doesn’t win 10 games if you take LeBron off it.
You could argue he's a coach maker as much as he's a coach killer. Lue, Vogel and Spolestra all have rings on their finger because of Lebron.LeBron James is a coach killer. He’s not the player he used to be. He takes half of the defensive possessions off. He thinks he’s a GM, coach and player. He’s only won when he’s been surrounded with an abundance of talent. He’s never been on a team that has been developed. He doesn’t listen and he does what he wants. Besides the money, I don’t see why anyone would want that job.
he decimates franchises by forcing the GMs to do what he wants NOW! Rich Paul is a nightmare, imo. the NBA had to step in and give the cavs a bunch of #1 picks to cover for what LeBron did to them. Look at what the Cavs did after lebron left them...decimated. Now hes doing the same to the Lakers. Pretty sure he had a huge say in their current roster construction. they had a ton of nice talent on the roster when he arrived now they have...nothing. Once he destroys that franchise's immediate future, then he'll just go somewhere else. Same would be for Miami Heat but they have Riley/Spoelstra who are smart enough to win with non-drafted players and smart draft picks. Meanwhile, LeBrn gets painted as this selfless player who gifts his time and energy to these teams and elevates them to win...his model for winning is inherently unsustainable. He forces teams to trade their future to stack whatever roster he is on for the short-term benefit...in a way that cannot last long-term by design...then leaves once they run out of gas. he's no saint.You could argue he's a coach maker as much as he's a coach killer. Lue, Vogel and Spolestra all have rings on their finger because of Lebron.
As far as not being the player he used to be, that is probably technically accurate as all players regress as they're approaching 40, but he averaged 30/8/6 on 51% shooting at age 37. Who else has done that at that age in league history?
The Cavs didn't make the playoffs in the five years before Lebron arrived. They then made the playoffs five out of the six years he was there (including getting out of the first round every time and a Finals run). In the four years he was in Miami, they were abysmal. He returns for four years, and they go to the Finals every year including a title. He leaves, they're immediately abysmal again. I just don't see how he wasn't a huge net positive for that franchise.Look at what the Cavs did after lebron left them...decimated.
The concept of mortgaging the future and putting all your chips in and going for it while you have a superstar is not exclusive to LeBron.he decimates franchises by forcing the GMs to do what he wants NOW! Rich Paul is a nightmare, imo. the NBA had to step in and give the cavs a bunch of #1 picks to cover for what LeBron did to them. Look at what the Cavs did after lebron left them...decimated. Now hes doing the same to the Lakers. Pretty sure he had a huge say in their current roster construction. they had a ton of nice talent on the roster when he arrived now they have...nothing. Once he destroys that franchise's immediate future, then he'll just go somewhere else. Same would be for Miami Heat but they have Riley/Spoelstra who are smart enough to win with non-drafted players and smart draft picks. Meanwhile, LeBrn gets painted as this selfless player who gifts his time and energy to these teams and elevates them to win...his model for winning is inherently unsustainable. He forces teams to trade their future to stack whatever roster he is on for the short-term benefit...in a way that cannot last long-term by design...then leaves once they run out of gas. he's no saint.
They’re on their way now. Garland and Mobley is about as good of a young 1-2 punch as you can get.The Cavs didn't make the playoffs in the five years before Lebron arrived. They then made the playoffs five out of the six years he was there (including getting out of the first round every time and a Finals run). In the four years he was in Miami, they were abysmal. He returns for four years, and they go to the Finals every year including a title. He leaves, they're immediately abysmal again. I just don't see how he wasn't a huge net positive for that franchise.
I mean, the Cavs had the first pick in the 2013 draft. They took Anthony Bennett who was out of the league after a couple years. That incompetence had nothing to do with Lebron.
He’s always stacked his teams and while obviously he’s had a great career, he hasn’t won nearly as much as he should have with those stacked teams if he truly was the greatest player of all time (he isn’t).
And without Pippen I’m not sure if MJ even has one.He’s always stacked his teams and while obviously he’s had a great career, he hasn’t won nearly as much as he should have with those stacked teams if he truly was the greatest player of all time (he isn’t).
Yeah. I’m thinking hard to come up with an NBA champion in my lifetime that didn’t have at least 2 great players.And without Pippen I’m not sure if MJ even has one.
Not sure what my argument has to do with Jim. My statement was just about LeBron not being the greatest player ever.Literally, not figuratively the same argument haters use against Boeheim
That may be true. I do know Jordan, with arguably a top 5 shooting guard of all time and a hall of fame power forward, wouldn’t have lost to the Dallas Mavericks though.And without Pippen I’m not sure if MJ even has one.
He’s certainly in the conversation.Not sure what my argument has to do with Jim. My statement was just about LeBron not being the greatest player ever.
Well, he didn’t lose. LeBron has with better teams before, and that’s my point.Jordan “only” needed three other HOF players to win those titles from 96-98.