When he does his “full seed list” he has Syracuse as under consideration. They were 84th last week
he most certainly does not have an agenda against Syracuse. If I had to guess, he couldn't care less about them or any other team in particular outside of St. Joes.Just because you’re first of the biggest name doesn't mean you’re the best, Lunardi has proved that time and time again. He’s gotta have an agenda against Syracuse at this point
Agenda? What’s the agenda, what year should we have gotten in and we didn’t?Just because you’re first of the biggest name doesn't mean you’re the best, Lunardi has proved that time and time again. He’s gotta have an agenda against Syracuse at this point
Still think we need 2...however way it is, we need 2 more wins...clemson and 1 in the ACCT or...2 in the ACCT
That is exactly what he does every year... I thinks he checks people like jerry Palm the week before and his picks change drastically. He then claims only 1 or 2 wrong... All year long he has been saying 3 maybe 4 from ACC.. We will seedoes Lunardi still change his bubble teams like an hour before the selection show, where he magically changes a bunch of teams? he's a hack and just does this for clickbait, but honestly throw the last 8-12 teams in a blender as there is not much to sperate any of 'em.
Agenda? What’s the agenda, what year should we have gotten in and we didn’t?
These schools should up their guarantee prices since they're so valuable to gaming the NET system.Hopefully we learned something from our scheduling this year and our NET experience. Next season we should game the NET rankings just as other teams, and entire conferences did this season. 9 of our 11 OOC games next season should be scheduled against Q4 teams. Run up the margin of victory in all 9 of those games. That's how you get a high NET. Check out most of the Big 12 teams this season. They all played 8-9 Q4 games. We have 4.
Palm isnt accurate either, hes 50 spots behind Lunardi according to bracket matrix.That is exactly what he does every year... I thinks he checks people like jerry Palm the week before and his picks change drastically. He then claims only 1 or 2 wrong... All year long he has been saying 3 maybe 4 from ACC.. We will see
I mean, most people on this board agree we're not in the tournament right now, and need at least 2 wins to feel like we're on the bubble.Just because you’re first of the biggest name doesn't mean you’re the best, Lunardi has proved that time and time again. He’s gotta have an agenda against Syracuse at this point
The “bracketologists” rarely go above 60 in the NET. My concern is the NCAA tournament committee won’t either.No one has us in bracket matrix right now, fwiw