As somebody who works in social media, I get where Matt is going with the survey. He's trying to get an idea of who is vocal about Cuse sports. The donation question was poorly phrased, but again, he's trying to get a sense of who is interacting.
My two cents on Syracuse basketball as a whole - the game has evolved immensely ever since I started seriously watching (2003 was our family's first year of season tickets). Yes, the Duke, UNC, UK, Kansas teams are still getting top talent. But, kids that are still really darn good players, are going to schools like NCST, FSU, etc. Not your typical basketball powerhouses. Syracuse is 10,000% having down years, but other teams that were cakewalks before are legit teams now.
It all boils down to recruiting. I've said for quite sometime that I cannot stand the project players that Syracuse recruits. At the center position, I don't have to get too deep into it. No legit strength on the interior. Sidibe was close, but the injuries have held him back. Then you've got a guy like Edwards who really brings height and that's about it. Frank, we haven't seen enough to get a good glimpse of what he can bring. In other spots, we've recruited guys like Moyer (transfer), Braswell (was never high on him. Just feels awkward watching him at times), and they don't pan out (Kaleb, Chino). They're scholarships that essentially end up wasted when they don't play/aren't ready/transfer. Yes, you will get guys like CJ, Grant, that contribute to all-conference levels, but it doesn't help if the next guy up isn't ready. Easier said than done, but SU really needs to focus on guys who come to campus ready to play.
For coaching, I love Boeheim. Everything he's done for the school and to put us on the map. The game has gone by him. We don't need to beat the Kadary drum again. The 2-3 zone worked years ago when teams weren't shooting and making threes more than ever before. I don't have a problem with the zone, but I have a problem when teams are shooting lights out and we still sit in the zone. They're D1 players - they should be able to play man-to-man defense. Offensively, it's also isolation ball. Buddy drive to the elbow, stops dribbling, looks to fade. AG drives, stepback for a shot, or a three pointer with a man on him in the triple threat. It's an easy offense to prepare against and obviously if shots don't fall, they aren't winning. Running offensive sets at least gets you the opportunity for a great shot rather than iso ball.
Facilities, we have the Dome. We can pack 34k for a bigtime game and 17k for a cupcake. Everything else, big time schools have exactly the same (practice facilities, training rooms). If I'm a player and have multiple offers, why would I choose Syracuse when I could get the same treatment at a Duke, UNC, UVA with the same benefits (ACC grind, on TV a lot, put players in the league).
I think post Boeheim will be a huge test for us as a fanbase. If a guy like Hopkins comes back and can recruit great players to come, awesome. Syracuse will be the top job when he's done, unless Coach K, Roy, Cal, any of those guys move on at the same time. At the end of the day, I think it comes down to recruiting legit basketball players (not 4 year projects) and a legit coaching scheme.
I don't think it's wrong to have an expectation of 20 wins every year and a top 6 seed in the tournament.
TLDR: Recruiting needs to be better, game has gone by Boeheim, but no clue if the next guy will bring us back to glory immediately.