GooseMutt
All Conference
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2016
- Messages
- 3,978
- Like
- 7,010
Holy moly. Reg You post good stuff!From his Snapchat story. This is what we like to see hopefully he continues to grow and it translate to oncourt success.
Holy moly. Reg You post good stuff!From his Snapchat story. This is what we like to see hopefully he continues to grow and it translate to oncourt success.
From his Snapchat story. This is what we like to see hopefully he continues to grow and it translate to oncourt success.
200%??Dang! I wonder what a guy like White shoots on those things?
No doubt at least 60%. I feel comfortable around 82% though. We'll see how it falls!I feel comfortable expecting Moyer to shoot 60 percent for three next season. That would be pretty good right.
Matt working hard at home...kids been doing two a days on his own. Seems to be really driven and ready to show people what he's made of! Like what I've seen from him lately.
If he can be NEARLY as effective around the arc as junior CJ Fair was I think this could be a tough team.
He certainly will not have the opposition's defense keying on him the way Senior Fair did.Hopefully not senior Fair from the arc.
His shot looks much improved. Thats very good to see.
He certainly will not have the opposition's defense keying on him the way Senior Fair did.
Agreed. One of the reasons Fair shot so well as a junior was be cause he only took really good looks from 3. Shot selection can make an average shooter appear to be much better. AW3 shot 40% and many of those were well defended.
Well, yes and no. I agree that they don't mean that you are a good shooter. But if you miss most of them, it might very well mean you aren't a good shooter.I'd like to think positive when looking at shooting drills, but they almost mean nothing.
Yeah but at least the mechanics look better, his shot was very hurky-jurky coming out of South Kent IMOI'd like to think positive when looking at shooting drills, but they almost mean nothing.
Andrew White's 40% shooting from 3 was very impressive in my opinion because he maintained the percentage on a very high volume of shot attempts, and as you said, many (most?) of them were well defended.
For sure. I was blown away often at how White over and over drilled contested shots. There was a similar tune, IMO, with Cooney. Lots of contested shots but he missed more of them. Obviously White is a better shooter but I worry about the staff being able to draw up open looks for any shooters we have. Seems like an systemic epidemic if you ask me.
Yah, the epidemic is called, not having any beefy low post guys that can score on the low block. Jump-shooting teams are forced to take contested shots because, without low post scoring, they have no choice. Unless they have NBA-quality guards that can get to the rim at will (MR and MCW come to mind), they're unbalanced and one-dimensional. I mean, the last few yeas it's been so bad that I could draw up our opponents' defensive game plan: pack the lane and FG the shooters. Outmuscle our "center" for the inevitable misses. W.For sure. I was blown away often at how White over and over drilled contested shots. There was a similar tune, IMO, with Cooney. Lots of contested shots but he missed more of them. Obviously White is a better shooter but I worry about the staff being able to draw up open looks for any shooters we have. Seems like an systemic epidemic if you ask me.
Yah, the epidemic is called, not having any beefy low post guys that can score on the low block. Jump-shooting teams are forced to take contested shots because, without low post scoring, they have no choice. Unless they have NBA-quality guards that can get to the rim at will (MR and MCW come to mind), they're unbalanced and one-dimensional. I mean, the last few yeas it's been so bad that I could draw up our opponents' defensive game plan: pack the lane and FG the shooters. Outmuscle our "center" for the inevitable misses. W.
And that's exactly the point -- they earn a win or two --- when/if they light it up from outside. But when the 3's don't drop, they've got nothing else. BC (although they have a 7 footer) has been in that position, because their inside guy isn't really a scorer. Same with ND last year .. shooters and a 6'7 guy inside. Not a recipe' for long-term success, unless you have amazingly talented guards that can get to the rim and create/distribute in the lane. That hasn't been us since Malachai left (and even then, we struggled for most of the season before making an awesome tourney run).Oh the lack of post scoring and unbalanced teams are factors. But we see teams who have those same problems generate way more motion and can free up shooters all the time. Usually those mid-majors who earn a win or two every year in the Tourney by just running their stuff against more 'talented' teams.