I really hate the hybrid. The important question is what do FSU and Clemson think about this? As long as they're happy, I'm happy..
So how many of you still want to be in the BE?
Under your line of thinking, FSU and Clemson continue to seek out other conferences to play in.
We know the ACC tried to raise the exit fee substantially after SU and Pitt joined but the proposal was voted down, reportedly by Clemson and Florida State. They both reportedly really wanted ND in the ACC. Have to believe ND would not join without a major increase in the exit fee to guarantee stability. Looks to me as though Florida State and Clemson were in favor of this...I really hate the hybrid. The important question is what do FSU and Clemson think about this? As long as they're happy, I'm happy.
ND promised the BE football games, too. How'd that work out...
Louisville: Academics do matter. WVU would have been invited instead of us, if that weren't the case.
UConn isn't going anywhere. Partial member = no need for #16.
$50mil exit fee is huge, and great, but won't stop anyone from leaving if they really want to. Rights are much more important.
We should add a hockey team. Can you imagine? Sweet unis, too. Toronto's College Team.
I think this news couldn't be better in the long term. A $50 million exit fee pretty much guarantees stability for the ACC, if ND football is ever going to join a conference it will almost certainly be the ACC, and SU's administration looks golden for choosing to move to the ACC and having a seat in the east coast's only major conference. Change is the only certainty, but the ACC is as permanent as we can forsee. Kudos to Nancy Cantor, Daryl Gross, and anyone else that made this happen for SU. Thank you!
What does UConn bring to the ACC? BTW check your Inbox tooThe 9 month rumor finally happens.
Not sure how I feel about it. Hopefully it comes with something about ND becoming a full member at some point based upon some sort of criteria related to the landscape.
Next move will now be bringing in UConn.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
We know the ACC tried to raise the exit fee substantially after SU and Pitt joined but the proposal was voted down, reportedly by Clemson and Florida State. They both reportedly really wanted ND in the ACC. Have to believe ND would not join without a major increase in the exit fee to guarantee stability. Looks to me as though Florida State and Clemson were in favor of this...
Wrong the Dude of WV said this will shove FSU out the door...and his buddy MHVer siad FSU and Clemson voted against the exit fee increase. Can't beleive people still listen to these guys.
Good one.
But with JHU in the ACC, why even have the LAX NCAA Tourney. Just give the winner of the ACC the NCAA trophy.
The ACC Lacrosse conference is now the strongest conference in any sport. In no other sport is there this kind of concentration of the best teams in the sport.
Some of you people can't possibly have any business experience.
Put aside the ND hate for a moment and think this through...
ND is the ONLY school currently not in a Big 5 conference that has ANY significant incremental value. ($$$)
ND has committed to playing 5 ACC football games a year. Other ACC schools play 9. That's 55%. Each of those 5 games will be on TV ($$$) and secure sell out crowds when ACC schools host ($$$).
ND is part of the ACC's bowl package. Bowls love ND because they draw big crowds and strong TV ratings. The ACC now has additional leverage to sign high-value bowl affiliations. ($$$)
ND fits the ACC's academic profile perfectly, and brings a solid program to the best hoops conference in the nation. They also have top-tier Olympic sports -- you may not care, but an athletic league does. (Brand)
I won't hold my breath, but someday if ND decides to join a conference full-time for football, it'll be the ACC ($$$).
The ACC is now without question the premiere east coast athletic conference. (sponsorship $$$)
Honestly, this is a no brainer. You get significant financial value and increased brand strength, all for them playing 5 games a year instead of 9.
:bang:
What exactly does playing the Domers once every three years do for FSU and Clemson? If the other ACC schools wanted to increase the exit fee to prevent FSU and Clemson from leaving, they could have done so without attaching a leech to the conference.
That is rigged...granted the SEC is the best league but I don't beleive the last 6 crowned champs were always the best team.umm. the SEC has won the past 6 national championships in football.
All you need to know is that the exit fee is 50 mill. FSU and Clemson signed off on that. Obviously, they are fine with this move.
Doesn't matter what Clemson or FSU think of this.
They've got 50 million reasons to keep quiet and accept whatever happens to them at this point.
And that number will only climb every year.
It seems to me that it has a positive impact on their status within the football world. Teams define themselves by who they choose to play and who chooses to play them. Would Clemson & Florida State benefit more from playing ND every few years or Rutgers? Clemson & FSU want to play good teams to enhance their resume. ND provides that.What exactly does playing the Domers once every three years do for FSU and Clemson? If the other ACC schools wanted to increase the exit fee to prevent FSU and Clemson from leaving, they could have done so without attaching a leech to the conference.
All you need to know is that the exit fee is 50 mill. FSU and Clemson signed off on that. Obviously, they are fine with this move.
This move was mutually beneficial. ND gets their special deal, and the ACC remains stable with a $50 million exit fee. Clemson and FSU aren't going anywhere. Not to mention this re-opens the TV deal so hopefully we make a few extra bucks on that also.
That's not the point I was making.Do people honestly think Swofford didn't consult FSU and Clemson to get their buy-in? Do people think Swofford is dumb enough to make decisions that those two schools disagree with? Let me assure you that those schools are totally on board with this because ND is going to fill their stadiums semi-regularly and increase the ACC TV numbers.
Why would ND move now? I think it says a lot about what is happening with the Big East and television negotiations.
Did ESPN low ball the BE big time?
Did ND talk with business partner NBC about numbers for the Big East? Were they told a big offer was not going to be forthcoming?
The ACC takes more money off the table from the Big East. The ACC wins a key battle with the Big 12 regarding expansion. The ACC increases its buyout to the highest numbers for any conference, making it extremely stable overnight.
The next big question is if the ACC will expand again, and if so, will it be for all sports or for another Notre Dame type school with no football?
If it is going to be a team with no football, I can't see Georgetown getting in. Maryland hates them. The Hoyas have no fan base and the ACC already has the market. Makes no sense.