shandeezy7
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 15,124
- Like
- 38,335
I'm all for advanced stats, but what? Now we are calculating "luck?"
They just call it luck but for example it basically says, Anthony Davis shoots ____% on open shots from this spot on the floor. Tonight, he shot ___%. The difference between the two is the "luck". So essentially, if you account for the quality of the shots and who was taking the shots, the Lakers would generally expect to have scored 139 points last night and instead they scored 93.I'm all for advanced stats, but what? Now we are calculating "luck?"
They just call it luck but for example it basically says, Anthony Davis shoots ____% on open shots from this spot on the floor. Tonight, he shot ___%. The difference between the two is the "luck". So essentially, if you account for the quality of the shots and who was taking the shots, the Lakers would generally expect to have scored 139 points last night and instead they scored 93.
Yeah I assumed it was calculated similarly to that, but I guess I'm not sure of the value of a stat that basically says if every player shoots their average in these given situations, then they would score X points. Sure, but averages usually aren't accumulated over the course of a season by shooting the same percentage every single night. There are ups and downs each night, and when you are dealing with an entire team's worth of different players with different levels of effectiveness each game, then it makes it even more difficult in my eyes to say they a team is expected to score a certain amount.
I think the stat has quite a bit of value,
How often do we hear a coach say "We were just not hitting our shots"... but often times the issue was moreso the difficulty of the shots you were taking. This stat will at least tell a bit more of the truth when that comment is made.
And that is important going forward from a strategy perspective (i.e. you lost, but how much do you need to change or keep doing) -- that being said like any modern stat you have to balance it with other factors that are more subjective.
I think the stat has quite a bit of value,
How often do we hear a coach say "We were just not hitting our shots"... but often times the issue was moreso the difficulty of the shots you were taking. This stat will at least tell a bit more of the truth when that comment is made.
And that is important going forward from a strategy perspective (i.e. you lost, but how much do you need to change or keep doing) -- that being said like any modern stat you have to balance it with other factors that are more subjective.
The Lakers obviously need some offensive help right now, but I wonder if they aren't interested in sacrificing defense for offense. They did just hold a Portland team that has averaged 126 ppg in the bubble to 100 points. Dion or JR would definitely give you more offensive options, but are they providing you a net positive with their play on the other end? Losing 125-120 isn't much better than losing 100-93.
Rondo can’t shoot. The Lakers issues are they can’t shoot.Their first quarter struggles were because they couldn’t make a three point shot.Is Rondo expected to return this week? Won’t discount his impact in allowing Lebron to do what he needs to do.
Lebron’s still good enough to take over the series with AD if someone like Kuz/Dion/etc. have a great game to edge one too. Think Rondo’s playmaking and transition abilities help take a little pressure off Lebron to focus on getting everyone else going. Lebron needs to be scoring over 30 points a game this series.Rondo can’t shoot. The Lakers issues are they can’t shoot.Their first quarter struggles were because they couldn’t make a three point shot.
KCP and Danny Green were why the Lakers lost last night.
The Blazers aren’t bums but they aren’t winning this series.
I wouldn't expect the Blazers to score 100 each game either. I think they score closer to 110 every game.
115 ppg on the season. 125 ppg in the eight bubble games. We saw what the Lakers "shooting luck" was for that game. Curious what it was for the Blazers as well, if it's a stat we are going to value.
NBA is dying, guys.
Oh wait, they were, by far, the most watched thing on TV by the key demo.
That being said. Lebron is still THEE draw. Portland/Lakers did double the first game.
These NBA playoffs are awesome. I love no travel and no home court advantage. Levels the playing field. That said I could watch Gobert vs Jokic for 82 games. Incredible intensity.LOL. I’ve heard people repeat that whole “NBA ratings are down because of the kneeling and the Jersey messages.” Like a bunch of parrots. Many can’t even be bothered to do basic fact checking anymore.
Don't really have 400 to drop on the arcade game. But anyone know why they didn't remaster NBA jam for ps4? They would have made a fortune.i have NBA jams and the 40th anniverary pac man (which includes galaga)...
they are a bargain if you ask me...full arcade experience at fraction of the cost...they play exactly like the original programming.
This.
They held Lillard to 10 second half points. They aren’t playing Waiters over Caruso/KCP. The D was very good. They couldn’t shoot and LeBron and AD choked at the FT line.
Series could go either way. I expect the Lakers to have a hot shooting game. I also expect Lillard to drop 80.