NineOneSeven
2018-19 Iggy Hoops Leader Scorer
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 41,841
- Like
- 72,443
I can buy that but who are they replacing?
Luka is amazing.I'm not going to cape for Harden. I don't like him.
My bigger point is that Luka is a stud. And on a trajectory to be an all-timer.
His team needs to be better around him, which should eventually happen.
I give LeBron a huge amount of credit for winning when JR Smith was a key player. Never thought that would happen.
I'm not going to cape for Harden. I don't like him.
My bigger point is that Luka is a stud. And on a trajectory to be an all-timer.
His team needs to be better around him, which should eventually happen.
Yup. Look how bad the Clippers were for 20 years or whatever with bad ownership/leadership. And the Knicks. It's not easy being good for an extended time but some franchises have done it.The problem is bad ownership. Jeanie Buss isn't Dr. Buss.
There's no fix for bad ownership. Bad owners habitually make bad decisions. Overwhelming talent can be a bandaid. But that's really it.
The difference between the results the Kings get and the Lakers get is location of the franchise.
Yep - one of the traits of good leaders is identifying and acknowledging (and then fixing) wrong choices (or unplanned consequences, whatever you want to call it). Kudos for Griffin for that. No one is perfect, but the best people hit more than miss and learn from mistakes to get better.
Couldn't agree more with what you wrote.
I agree for the most part, but we saw in OKC that Harden was really good off ball too until he decided he didn’t want to be anymore. I’m not really sure Luka is any different in that regard. He (rightly) wants the ball in his hands pretty much at all times.Peak Harden? You mean MVP, 1st Team All NBA six out of seven years? Guy who was one hamstring on CP3 away from likely winning a title?
Luka has arguably had the best start of a career of all time. The big difference between the two is that Luka can play on ball D for guys that aren't dynamic drivers and on offense he has a back down game and can play back to the basket.
He can also play off ball better. Harden wouldn't move without the ball. Luka can play off ball and has done it pre NBA.
The other difference is he's come through in huge playoff games against very tough teams (Clips w/ PG13 and Kawhi; 64-win Suns team) and is scoring at the level of MJ in the playoffs, basically.
I get that they are comparable, but Luka through his first four years is much more accomplished than Harden. He's about to get his third straight All NBA First Team. If he had a legit second player and someone who could functionally play center, the Mavs would be favored to win the title right now.
Still a long way to go in their careers. I don’t think we can just take longevity for granted. But they’re definitely on track for top 12 all time IMO.Luka and Giannis will both finish as top 12 all-time players.
I agree for the most part, but we saw in OKC that Harden was really good off ball too until he decided he didn’t want to be anymore. I’m not really sure Luka is any different in that regard. He (rightly) wants the ball in his hands pretty much at all times.
I think Luka is both a better passer and defender than Peak Harden though and Luka has also just been insane in the playoffs vs. Harden’s relatively consistent struggles.
18-1 start? This series is drunk.
The “he didn’t win until he got Pippen” people are the absolute worst. I hate stupid sports fans.
He ate everything. He ain’t no baby no more.Good lord, what happened to Big Baby?
Luka and vintage Harden are each highly skilled ball dominant players who are difficult to stop one on one...yet don't have enough help. One was hated and considered a fraud...Peak Harden? You mean MVP, 1st Team All NBA six out of seven years? Guy who was one hamstring on CP3 away from likely winning a title?
Luka has arguably had the best start of a career of all time. The big difference between the two is that Luka can play on ball D for guys that aren't dynamic drivers and on offense he has a back down game and can play back to the basket.
He can also play off ball better. Harden wouldn't move without the ball. Luka can play off ball and has done it pre NBA.
The other difference is he's come through in huge playoff games against very tough teams (Clips w/ PG13 and Kawhi; 64-win Suns team) and is scoring at the level of MJ in the playoffs, basically.
I get that they are comparable, but Luka through his first four years is much more accomplished than Harden. He's about to get his third straight All NBA First Team. If he had a legit second player and someone who could functionally play center, the Mavs would be favored to win the title right now.
Harden had no help as a Rocket almost every single year. Now he's crappy. But in his peak, give him the players Durant had around him at GS and see how that would work out. The entire "championship player" concept is bs and more a product of place and time than anything. I guess Luke Longley should be in the HallMy point was that if EVRYBODY was healthy, no one would be saying that Harden was a CP3 injury away from going to the finals. Its a misleading narrative for people who want to argue that he is a championship player. He isn't. Also, if CP3 was healthy, they likely still lose, because CP3 is gonna CP3 in the big game, anyway.
Now, if you want to say GS is a Klay Thompson injury away from having another ring, I will buy that all day long.
Luka and vintage Harden are each highly skilled ball dominant players who are difficult to stop one on one...yet don't have enough help. One was hated and considered a fraud...
Harden had no help as a Rocket almost every single year. Now he's crappy. But in his peak, give him the players Durant had around him at GS and see how that would work out. The entire "championship player" concept is bs and more a product of place and time than anything. I guess Luke Longley should be in the Hall
Harden didn’t try on defense and wouldn’t move without the ball. He also literally just stopped trying on two teams in 13 months.
That’s why he’s hated.
Luka can play on ball D ok. He will move off ball and is happy to bail out his teammates that get stuck at end of the shot clock.
Harden is a HoFer, no question. But Luka is better.
Yeah until Luka quits on 2 teams I'm giving him the nod. Though I think they both have the same off-season trainer.Harden didn’t try on defense and wouldn’t move without the ball. He also literally just stopped trying on two teams in 13 months.
That’s why he’s hated.
Luka can play on ball D ok. He will move off ball and is happy to bail out his teammates that get stuck at end of the shot clock.
Harden is a HoFer, no question. But Luka is better.
Yeah until Luka quits on 2 teams I'm giving him the nod. Though I think they both have the same off-season trainer.