Mareiniss
Starter
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 1,033
- Like
- 2,331
I've had a similar discussion for a while now.
I don't see why non-violent "extortion" should be illegal.
Let's say I have lawfully obtained accurate information about person A's wrongdoing
I can publish it ...no problem.
In fact, my right to publish it is constitutionally protected.
I can also contact person A and tell him I have this information.
Person A can then make an offer to obtain my silence.
No problem.
But if I give person A the option of buying the information to prevent my publishing it...all of a sudden I'm committing a crime.
My crime apparently is telling him (threatening?) I will do something I have an absolute right to do (publish) if he doesn't want to buy the information.
Why is that illegal?
Translation please?Dang, Duke be setting up VaTech players while they are out of town...now shutting down Twitter. They are deep out there guys and gals.
Translation please?
If you had information/proof that your next door neighbor robbed a bank would you notify the authorities or would you attempt to make a deal with your neighbor to split the money in return for remaining silent?
This dude is not as smart as he thinks he is. Ill take boies schiller over him all day.
For those who know something about criminal law... By revealing on Twitter that his client (Gary Franklin) delivered Nike money to DeAndre Ayton's mother to induce him to sign with Arizona, wasn't Avenatti implicating his client as an accessory or conspirator to defraud the school? Isn't that what the Adidas defendants were convicted of doing, i.e., channeling money to family members, and thereby defrauding the schools?
Shocked how many people are totally fine with people who have the money to pay someone off to keep the truth from being revealed. If you have the money, or want someone else’s $ to hide crimes etc, it’s all okay, no blood no foul no morals/ethics and tough luck if you don’t have the bucks to ‘earn’ your way out of crimes.
It’s like this was a transaction between 2 criminal parties with Avenatti negotiating his own non disclosure agreement, a common way those with more power can avoid accountability or judgement.The bigger $ wins these contests and they know it. There is more and more unethical practices publicly being practiced and condoned. The difference between right and wrong is so blurred.
It used to be much better when people attempted to keep their unethical and morally bankrupt behavior behind closed doors.
Is your first name Roger?
Why are you not more offended by those who would rather be paid off than reveal a crime or wrong doing.Shocked how many people are totally fine with people who have the money to pay someone off to keep the truth from being revealed. If you have the money, or want someone else’s $ to hide crimes etc, it’s all okay, no blood no foul no morals/ethics and tough luck if you don’t have the bucks to ‘earn’ your way out of crimes.
It’s like this was a transaction between 2 criminal parties with Avenatti negotiating his own non disclosure agreement, a common way those with more power can avoid accountability or judgement.The bigger $ wins these contests and they know it. There is more and more unethical practices publicly being practiced and condoned. The difference between right and wrong is so blurred.
Avenatti is an opportunist dipsh__ of the highest order (and probably a criminal) but this is certainly very, very interstingLet’s gooooooooo
Shouldn’t Mark Shwartz besetting uppitching his tent outside K’s house right about now?