The players as a whole did not win. The top 100 players might win, I suppose, in some strange way. But I am not sure they are winning, actually. Most are just keeping their head's above water and delaying the inevitable realization that they are not NBA material.
But beyond that? I am note sure. As stated, some will miss out and be left without a seat. Some will lose credits transferring. Some will get inferior college degrees. Some will drop out of school and regret it for years to come. Some will get a lifeline and as a results, lose the connection they have with their initial teammates. Some won't mesh with their new teammates. Some will get buried in their new programs. Some will "go pro" and find themselves playing in four-team Chilean Pro League for $350 a game. Some who stay will get recruited over from the HS and portal ranks. Some will lose their love for basketball, which is very sad.
But Kadary (who I love, genuinely will miss and wish all the best) will play 31 minutes/game at Kentucky (or where ever) as opposed to 26 at SU, where he has three assistant coaches to learn from that were top-flight lead guards during their playing days. If Kadary does not want to fend with Joe Girard, what is he going to experience at Kentucky or FSU? The Cats get 4-5 of the Top 25 players every year (and the top portal transfers) and FSU has a rotation of about 10 players most years.
This is all so silly. It is the AAU mindset (travel ball in other sports) that is wreaking havoc on college hoops as we know it. Greedy, parasitic adults who have somehow superseeded HS hoops and coaches. If met with adversity, I'll show you ... I am gonna leave and go somewhere else. What?
I hope Kadary did not ignore the experiences of Allen Griffin, who lost almost all his playing time as a junior, yet battled and rose above to thrive as a senior. I guarantee those learnings, that adversity, has served Allen well many, many times the last 20+ years.