buffalorange
2nd String
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 632
- Like
- 1,183
I hope both coaches are as excited to be here as we are to have them.
For betting fans: Does coach Beck a: laugh, or b:cry when he sees GS's throwing mechanics?
I hope both coaches are as excited to be here as we are to have them.
Yeah, Bronco doesn't mess around.Even with reports of negative recruiting against Dino, shows you how some others in the coaching world think of Dino. Bronco calling him and telling him to hire Anae and Beck is wonderful.
Wish we could add him to the staff as an analyst...Yeah, Bronco doesn't mess around.
Gotcha Hoo, thanks for sharing. On 247 it looked like the TE was still in there so was not sure.The only TE in the portal decided to return to UVa. The two WRs in the portal had zero catches last year.
C throws up on his shirt...I hope both coaches are as excited to be here as we are to have them.
For betting fans: Does coach Beck a: laugh, or b:cry when he sees GS's throwing mechanics?
c, defines a development plan to iron out the mechanicsI hope both coaches are as excited to be here as we are to have them.
For betting fans: Does coach Beck a: laugh, or b:cry when he sees GS's throwing mechanics?
Shrader has shown that he can make strong throws. I am sure Beck has seen that. Now he just has to teach him to consistently repeat the mechanics that result in strength and accuracy on his throws. His resume would indicate that he excels in this area.c, defines a development plan to iron out the mechanics
IMO he will always have issues passing the ball. He isn't going to win a game with his arm or lead a big comeback. But that is ok given what he can do.Thanks. pretty similar to what we did last year so personnel shouldn’t be a problem. I feel like I’m on an island, but I think Shrader could be a monster if he gets a little bit of help on the field and some good coaching. You just don’t run for close to 100 ypg as a starter if you don’t have supreme talent. Plus a closer look at his stats show he completed 57.5% at Miss St compared to 52.5% here while ypc was 1.5% higher at Miss St. This tells me he either had a much better play caller at Miss St, which is kind of obvious, or he didn’t have the help on the field. Kid has 2 more years. He can be a serious weapon.
IMO he will always have issues passing the ball. He isn't going to win a game with his arm or lead a big comeback. But that is ok given what he can do.
Some interesting numbers:
GS was 49.4% in our Ws and 54.2% in our losses
He was only 51.1% vs FBS
In the 1st and 3rd Qs he was over 64% but in the 2nd and 4th he was under 43%
1st down he was 61.8% but under 50% both 2nd and 3rd downs
On 3rd and <7 he was 57% but only 30% on 3rd and 7-9 yards
Inside our own 20 he was 35%, yet he was 69.7% opponents 40-20 with 3 TDs and 65.1% in the red zone with 3 TDs. He looked like a great QB once we crossed the 50, and a bad QB in our own territory.
He was only 43% losing by 1 score, which doesn't help tie the score and is more likely to extend the score.
Yeah right I’m like W T , short memories around here. LolSyracuse Stuns Virginia Tech With Late Touchdown to Snap Three Game Losing Streak
Garrett Shrader hit Damien Alford for a game winning touchdown in the final seconds.www.si.com
Alford and Virginia Tech disagree.
Come one winning a game with his arm means slinging it around. One play isn't slinging it around. People need to stop with the polarization of everything. Saying he isn't a great passer isn't anti Shrader.Yeah right I’m like W T , short memories around here. Lol
I certainly agree he isn't suddenly going to be a fluid passer.IMO he will always have issues passing the ball. He isn't going to win a game with his arm or lead a big comeback. But that is ok given what he can do.
Some interesting numbers:
GS was 49.4% in our Ws and 54.2% in our losses
He was only 51.1% vs FBS
In the 1st and 3rd Qs he was over 64% but in the 2nd and 4th he was under 43%
1st down he was 61.8% but under 50% both 2nd and 3rd downs
On 3rd and <7 he was 57% but only 30% on 3rd and 7-9 yards
't s
Inside our own 20 he was 35%, yet he was 69.7% opponents 40-20 with 3 TDs and 65.1% in the red zone with 3 TDs. He looked like a great QB once we crossed the 50, and a bad QB in our own territory.
He was only 43% losing by 1 score, which doesn't help tie the score and is more likely to extend the score.
edit your post bro, he led a comeback and won one with his arm....and there will likely be more.Come one winning a game with his arm means slinging it around. One play isn't slinging it around. People need to stop with the polarization of everything. Saying he isn't a great passer isn't anti Shrader.
Well, he did owe them big time seeing as he abruptly retired and blew up their current jobs.Yeah, Bronco doesn't mess around.
If you were stating that he isn't a great passer, I wouldn't have had a counter. You specifically said, and I highlighted, that he wasn't going to win a game with his arm and lead a comeback. If you meant something different, that didn't come across in your post. I just came up with an example from 2 months ago that refuted what you actually did say.Come one winning a game with his arm means slinging it around. One play isn't slinging it around. People need to stop with the polarization of everything. Saying he isn't a great passer isn't anti Shrader.
Just my opinion but I thought he got worn down in the second and fourth quarters of most games, especially in the fourth quarter.IMO he will always have issues passing the ball. He isn't going to win a game with his arm or lead a big comeback. But that is ok given what he can do.
Some interesting numbers:
GS was 49.4% in our Ws and 54.2% in our losses
He was only 51.1% vs FBS
In the 1st and 3rd Qs he was over 64% but in the 2nd and 4th he was under 43%
1st down he was 61.8% but under 50% both 2nd and 3rd downs
On 3rd and <7 he was 57% but only 30% on 3rd and 7-9 yards
Inside our own 20 he was 35%, yet he was 69.7% opponents 40-20 with 3 TDs and 65.1% in the red zone with 3 TDs. He looked like a great QB once we crossed the 50, and a bad QB in our own territory.
He was only 43% losing by 1 score, which doesn't help tie the score and is more likely to extend the score.
Semantics. Winning a game with his arm means throwing it 40+ times a game. Winning a game with one throw does not meet that widely held definition of winning a game with one's arm.edit your post bro, he led a comeback and won one with his arm...and there will likely be more.
Truthfully, his clutchness (probably not a real word) and fearlessness at end of games is probably one of his best attributes. He brought us back in several games, even ones that we didn't end up winning. That was a huge contrast from TD who I never had confidence he'd bring us back, even in a close game.If you were stating that he isn't a great passer, I wouldn't have had a counter. You specifically said, and I highlighted, that he wasn't going to win a game with his arm and lead a comeback. If you meant something different, that didn't come across in your post. I just came up with an example from 2 months ago that refuted what you actually did say.
How would anyone have known that was what you meant?Semantics. Winning a game with his arm means throwing it 40+ times a game.
If the coaches do what they’re hired to do, this fanbase has never had a problem rewarding wins.Now the fans need to. We left somewhere between $4M to $6M on the table in ticket sales this season.
ohhh kaayySemantics. Winning a game with his arm means throwing it 40+ times a game. Winning a game with one throw does not meet that widely held definition of winning a game with one's arm.