- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 98,373
- Like
- 196,588
Matt, I get what you're saying, I do. There's just no evidence to support your points. We brought Florida State to the Dome in 2004, when at the very least SU was still competitive, and we got 40K. That's just not moving the needle. Season tickets also declined that year from 2003. Gross is not an idiot, he sees this data and knows that even if we put Oklahoma on the Dome schedule the turnout and season ticket sales won't get a huge bump.
We'll be in the ACC. We'll get Florida State and Clemson on the home schedule, I assume in alternating years. We'll get either Miami or Virgina Tech in the Dome 2 out of every 3 years. There's going to be a "marquee" game or two on our home schedule every year going forward, no matter who we're playing OOC.
I would prefer to see big time OOC opponents play in the Dome. I just understand why Gross cut the deal that he did.
You have to also remember during that time there was a pretty strong anti-P feeling. Regardless of what the target is for attendance, whether it be 40K average and 45K for a bigger team or something higher or lower, these decisions will lower the bar from that. It's the chicken or the egg. Which came first? Dod we get small crowds because we lose or do we lose because we get small crowds? It's obvious the fans have been taken out of the equation completely even with the small decisions like an LOI event, staff reaching out to fans, etc. So they are putting all their eggs in the money basket in hopes that with facilities and coaching alone, they can win enough games to start bringing fans back. Might work, might not. I am more of a fan of using multiple strategies and not putting all my eggs in that one basket.